Alternative currency and balanced living system. Alternativna valuta i uravnoteženi životni sistem. Moneta alternativa e sistema di vita equilibrato.

Linija

Search

Home Alternative News News European Union: Ireland - A Referendum For Nothing

Crom Alternative News

Investigative journalism and useful articles on various topics.
marc

What the Lisbon Treaty really is?

 

Heroic Czech President fights on to stop EU because it's another step towards a world dictatorial government, cleverly disguised under terms like democracy, efficiency and prosperity.  

 

Vaclav Klaus has been extraordinarily successful. Twice elected prime minister, and twice president, he has been at the top of Czech politics almost uninterruptedly since the Velvet Revolution at the end of 1989 ended communism.



He can claim to have masterminded the most successful transition from communism to capitalism of all the former Soviet bloc countries.

Isolated in Prague Castle surrounded by yes men, Klaus has embarked on a one-man campaign to stop Europe in its tracks by bringing down the Lisbon treaty, the reform charter aimed at making Europe pull its weight in the world. The treaty has been eight excruciating years in the making and is now on the brink of coming into force. But not if Klaus gets his way.

Officials and diplomats are furious because the Oct 29 summit was scheduled to name a new EU President and foreign minister, posts created by the Lisbon Treaty.

Tony Blair, a war criminal is waiting to become the first President of European Union.


EU: Ireland - A Referendum For Nothing


October 15, 2009, by Laurent Dauré and Dominique Guillemin



On the 12th of June 2008, the Irish people rejected the Lisbon Treaty by a margin of 53.4% to 46.6%. The 2nd of October 2009, it will have to pronounce itself anew on this same text without a single comma having been changed, a text which itself is only a deliberately confused rewording of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe rejected by the French and Dutch voters in 2005. Thus, whatever the result, the second Irish referendum can only be one more illustration of the total loss of legitimacy of the European institutions.

2005, 2008, 2009… The referenda follow each other, the name of the text changes, the content remains the same; this relentlessness reveals the nature of the project: the European Union does not content itself with questioning the sovereignty of the European peoples to realize its ambition, it is the loss of sovereignty of these same peoples which constitutes its project. Can one still call a referendum what is in the end only the search for a unique answer validating a process of negotiation between the Irish government and the European Council?

It is appropriate first of all to recall the reception of the Irish “no” in 2008. Before even the announcement of the result, the polls forecasting the victory of the “no” had set off reactions listening to which it was clear that the Lisbon Treaty had to be adopted at all costs. A few days before the referendum, the French Minister of Foreign Affairs Bernard Kouchner, to only quote him, anticipated “[that in the case of a negative vote], one would have to continue, unrelentingly, to go very fast, to continue with the priorities that we have defined and attempt to convince the Irish who have already revoted once concerning in fact the Nice Treaty, to consider this treaty again.”

After the result, the from now well-polished machinery of negation of the people’s judgement functioned at full throttle; journalists and politicians relativized in chorus the bearing of the “no”, for, as the French journalist Jean Daniel said, “One country of 4 or 5 million in habitants like Ireland cannot take hostage nations uniting 490 million citizens”. National sovereignty is an obsolete notion for the authorized commentators. As soon as the day following the referendum, José Manuel Barroso proclaimed that “The Treaty is not dead. The Treaty is alive, and we will try to work to find a solution.” The Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk was one of the most frank: “The referendum results in Ireland do not disqualify the Treaty completely. We will continue seeking ways to bring it to life. Regardless of the referendum results I think we can be moderately optimistic about the EU finding a way to put it in force”. In a permanent antidemocratic soliloquy, the pro-European zealots trampled the sovereignty of the Irish people underfoot; for them the European Union is, lo and behold, already sovereign.

The Irish Prime Minister, Brian Cowen, showed very rapidly that he did not intend to support the decision of his people; on the contrary, he minimized its weight by declaring: “We must take time to digest what has happened, to understand why it did, to consult broadly amongst ourselves and with our partners”. This deliciously diplomatic language showed that it was now a question of finding a means to get round the Irish “no”. It has never been seriously considered to take account of the popular verdict. Such an attitude on the part of a democratically elected leader allows a profound uncertainty to persist concerning the true nature of the role of European elites: do they still represent their people or are they at the service of a supranational policy-making with which it is impossible to compromise and of which they would be in charge of applying locally the decisions? Such an ambiguity leads democracy to its ruin.

The chronology of the facts of the year elapsed since the Irish “no” of 2008 allows one to fully account for the refusal to adopt the popular will. After having spent the month of June in comments intended to either infantilize the Irish voters or make them feel guilty, Brian Cowen was summoned before the European Council, as a bad pupil to the headmaster’s office, to account for his failure. The Council then took over the process of ratification. It was impossible to change the text of the treaty without this new version being reexamined by all the states of the EU. Thus the method decided upon was that of an adjunction to the Treaty in the form of an additional protocol bearing on the questions of neutrality, of legislation concerning abortion and on the control of taxation, supposed focusing points of discontent during the first ballot. It will always be easier to abolish this protocol than to amend the whole of the Constitutional Treaty. Thereby does one think it skilful to “guarantee” the Irish a right they already have, that of deciding their own legislation. Enjoining the Irish to forfeit their sovereign power in exchange for simple guarantees on particular questions, the European Council seems to consider that one can prefer to give up one’s watch against the promise of always being able to ask the time…

If the European Union was a democratic system —which it never has been and will never be—, it would be unthinkable to require a sovereign people to vote again even though it has just delivered its verdict. It would not be any more conceivable to deprive the other peoples of speech. But the peoples of Europe live only in a parody of democracy; the verdict of the ballot boxes, only legitimate poll of public opinion, has ceased to be politically constraining. One must take account of this with the greatest seriousness and take measure of what the European leaders are ready to do for their project to succeed.

The French and Dutch “no” to the European Constitution have been purely and simply declared null and void; the only people who, thanks to the constitution of its country, has had the occasion to pronounce itself on the Lisbon Treaty sees itself being refused the right to say “no”. This refusal is to be understood in the strict sense; indeed, as José Luis Zapatero has said: “It is not possible for Ireland, with all due respect to its democratic choice, be able to stop such a necessary project.” Not only the neoliberal measures contained in the Lisbon Treaty, such as that of free and undistorted competition, are not amendable, but they are the very bedrock of the European project, and this last is not negotiable. Thus one could not hope without contradiction of reforming from the inside what constitutes the very nature of the “European idea”. Either it is accepted, either it is imposed. But where is democracy hidden in such practices?

The peoples see themselves systematically deprived of a public debate worthy of the name regarding the European Union. When the flagrantly pro-European Union bias of the media and the enraptured loyalty of the political parties to the European project lets emerge a public disavowal, this last is denied, got round. All the parties who have access to the media are favourable to the European construction —it is precisely for this reason that they have access to the media— whereas the rates of abstention in the European elections and the doubts as regards the democratic virtues of the European Union have never been as strong. All the great private powers (multinationals, banks, etc.) are favourable to the European construction, no doubt are they impatient that “social Europe” see the light of day… Political parties, the media and private wealth converge naturally towards Euro-liberalism, each finding (or hoping to find) in the decrepitude of the nation states an advantage and the means of increasing their power at the cost of the political and social rights of the citizens.

To get an idea of the impunity and of the preferential treatment which the European Union benefits from, imagine what would be the reaction of the “international community” and of the Western media if the government of Russia, Iran or Venezuela declared null and void or ignored the result of a referendum… Yet, it’s Europe which the media and the political parties are attempting to cover up for with massive publicity stunts and “pedagogy” —a politics marketing term to designate propaganda— the growing democratic deficit and totalitarian leaning of the European Union. The less we’ll truly be in a democracy, the more one will have to claim the opposite. The matter at hand here is to compensate for the disappearance of the actual entity by massive repetition of the word.

Whatever may be the result of the referendum of the 2nd of October, it will be taken in charge by the usual devices of media reception. If the “yes” wins, the atmosphere will be one given to relieved approval, and if the Irish again vote “no”, it will once again be a question of how to “get Europe out of this impasse”. It will matter above all else that the opportunity of the European construction not be brought into question. It is this absence of real political choice, characteristic of the post-democratic society to which an “elite of technicians” destines its peoples, that one perceives behind these remarks by the French ex-State Secretary for European Affairs Jean Pierre Jouyet:

“I sincerely believe that the referendum is not the right formula to adopt at the national level international treaties and regulations. Hence indeed, if other referenda [concerning the Treaty of Lisbon] had been organized, it is probable that certain of them would also have seen the “no” win. But it is not up to the people to decide these very complex questions.”




.

Crom - Free Planet Money, A Choice In The Form Of Alternative Currency That Through Internet And Mobile Banking Is Available To Everyone, Anywhere In The World. Crom - Novac Slobodnog Planeta, Izbor U Obliku Alternativne Valute Koji Je Kroz Internet I Mobilno Bankarstvo Dostupan Svakome, Svugdje U Svijetu. Crom - Denaro Dell Pianeta Libero, Una Scelta In Forma Di Moneta Alternativa Che È Attraverso Internet E Mobile Banking A Disposizione Di Tutti, Ovunque Nel Mondo.Publish Your News

If you are a registered user, you can publish and syndicate your content to the web through this news service.

Crom payment system represents a monetary reform, different way to make the money supply equal to the available supply of goods and services, and a new method to finance the economy without usury. In practise, an ideal opportunity not only for global and local business, but also for movements and projects which promote sustainable natural living, food sovereignty and greater auto-sufficiency, production and consumption of renewable green energy, such as Transition Towns and ecovillages. Crom platni sustav predstavlja monetarnu reformu, drugačiji način da se ponuda novca izjednači s dostupom ponudom roba i usluga, te novu metodu za financiranje gospodarstva bez lihvarenja. U praksi, idealna prilika ne samo za globalne i lokalne tvrtke, već i za pokrete i projekte koji promiču održivo prirodno življenje, prehrambenu suverenost i veću samodostatnost, proizvodnju i potrošnju zelene energije, kao što su u Tranzicijski Gradovi i eko sela. Sistema di pagamento Crom rappresenta una riforma monetaria, modo diverso per livellare l'offerta di moneta con l'offerta di beni e servizi disponibili, e un nuovo metodo per finanziare l'economia senza usura. In pratica, l'occasione ideale non solo per le aziende globali e locali, ma anche per i movimenti e progetti che promuovono la vita naturale sostenibile, sovranità alimentare e una maggiore auto-sufficienza, produzione e consumo di energia verde rinnovabile, come le Città in Transizione e ecovillaggi.    News Categories

.

 Regardless of whether you are the owner of e-shop, small entrepreneurs, worker looking for a housing loan, farmer in financial difficulties or an ordinary consumer who needs to borrow money to buy a new television, Crom Alternative Currency System offers monetary sovereignty and the possibility of life with more democracy and less police, military and lawyers, less taxes and more tourist travels with vehicles that do not pollute the environment, less stress and more free time and going to the restaurant more often... Bez obzira na to jesi li vlasnik elektronske trgovine, mali poduzetnik, radnik u potrazi za stambenim kreditom, farmer u financijskim problemima ili obični potrošač koji treba posuditi novac za kupnju nove televizije, Sustav Alternativne Valute Crom nudi monetarnu suverenost i pruža mogućnost života s više demokracije i manje policije, vojske i advokata, manje poreza i više turističkih putovanja vozilima koja ne zagađuju okoliš, manje stresa i više slobodnog vremena i odlaska u restorane... Non importa se sei il proprietario di un negozio online, piccolo imprenditore, lavoratore in cerca di mutuo per l'acquisto della prima casa, l'agricoltore in difficoltà finanziarie o consumatore che ha bisogno di un prestito di denaro per comprare una televisione nuova, Sistema Di Moneta Alternativa Crom offre la sovranità monetaria e una possibilità di vita con più democrazia e meno polizia, militari e avvocati, meno tasse e più viaggi turistici con veicoli che non inquinano l'ambiente, meno stress e più tempo libero e uscite al ristorante...    Login

What happens next if the state can go bankrupt?
 

 Tired of financial crisis, public and private debt, high interest rates, increasing inflation, declining purchasing power and excuses? It's a time for a change... something new and completely different... independent monetary and financial system, marketplace and social network - all in one... Umoran od financijskih kriza, javnog i privatnog duga, visokih kamata, porasta inflacije, pada kupovne moći i političkih izvinjenja? Vrijeme je za promjene... nešto novo i sasvim drugačije... neovisni monetarno financijski sustav, tržnica i društvena mreža - sve u jednom... Stanco delle crisi finanziarie, debito pubblico e privato, alti tassi di interesse, inflazione crescente, declino del potere di acquisto e scuse politiche? È ora di cambiare... qualcosa di nuovo e completamente diverso... sistema monetario e finanziario indipendente, mercato e rete sociale - tutto in uno...     Who Is Online?

We have 2452 guests online

Line

nezavisne vijesti, notizie indipendenti, independent news, informations, informacije, informazioni, kredit, loan, prestito, seigniorage, mutuo, signoraggio Latest Forum Posts