Maxi-Fraud: Deutsche Bank Hid $12 Billion In Losses To Avoid A Government Bail-Out
Forget the perfectly anticipated Greek (selective) default. This is the real deal. The FT just released a blockbuster that Europe's most important and significant bank, Deutsche Bank, hid $12 billion in losses during the financial crisis, helping the bank avoid a government bail-out, according to three former bank employees who filed complaints to US regulators. US regulators, whose chief of enforcement currently was none other than the General Counsel of Deutsche Bank at the time!
From the FT:
The three complaints, made to regulators including the US Securities and Exchange Commission, claim that Deutsche misvalued a giant position in derivatives structures known as leveraged super senior trades, according to people familiar with the complaints.
All three allege that if Deutsche had accounted properly for its positions – worth $130bn on a notional level – its capital would have fallen to dangerous levels during the financial crisis and it might have required a government bail-out to survive.
Instead, they allege, the bank’s traders – with the knowledge of senior executives – avoided recording “mark-to-market”, or paper, losses during the unprecedented turmoil in credit markets in 2007-2009.
Two of the former employees allege that Deutsche mismarked the value of insurance provided in 2009 by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway on some of the positions. The existence of these arrangements has not been previously disclosed.
Naturally, DB is defending itself in the only way it knows: "this is complicated stuff, and we know better than those guys." In other words, this is just a "tempest in a teapot." Where have we heard that before...
The bank said the investigation revealed that the allegations “stem from people without personal knowledge of, or responsibility for, key facts and information”. Deutsche promised “to continue to co-operate fully with the SEC’s investigation of this matter”.
The complaints were made at different times in 2010 and 2011 independently of each other. All of the men spent hours with SEC enforcement attorneys and provided internal bank documents during multiple meetings, people familiar with the matter say.
SEC enforcement attorneys eh? Because this is where it gets really fun: the person who was in charge of DB's legal compliance at the time was none other than Robert Khuzami. The same Robert Khuzami who just happens to be the chief of enforcement at the SEC!
Robert Khuzami, head of enforcement at the SEC, has recused himself from all Deutsche Bank investigations because he was Deutsche’s general counsel for the Americas from 2004 to 2009. Dick Walker, Deutsche’s general counsel, is a former head of enforcement at the SEC. The SEC declined to comment on the investigation.
Sadly, the "we are too sophisicated" defense may not be very effective this time.
Two of the former Deutsche employees have alleged they were pushed out of the bank as a result of reporting their concerns internally.
One of them, Eric Ben-Artzi, a risk manager at Deutsche, was fired three days after submitting a complaint to the SEC. In a separate complaint to the Department of Labor, he claims his dismissal was retaliation for his allegations.
Matthew Simpson, a senior trader at Deutsche, also left the company after submitting his own complaint to the SEC. Mr Simpson declined to comment. Deutsche Bank paid Mr Simpson $900,000 to settle his anti-retaliation lawsuit. Reuters reported in June 2011 that Mr Simpson had raised concerns about improper valuation of the derivatives portfolio.
The third complainant, who worked in risk management and has requested anonymity, raised his concerns to the SEC and voluntarily left the bank.
Or actually, since every bank in the world is forced to lie, cheat and mismark its own balance sheets every single day, not least of all the European Central Bank which as of moments ago has to accepted defaulted Greek bonds as collateral, this may just be completely ignored.
After all opening this particular Pandora's Box may well reveal that not only DB but the world's entire financial system is completely and totally insolvent.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants, but debt is the money of slaves.
IRS taken to U.S. Supreme Court for unconstitutional and illegal actions.
What you have been told all your life about income taxes and the IRS is a lie. Hard to believe? Probably not, but then, HOW DO YOU PROVE IT? Well, let?s begin by asking one simple question out of dozens we could ask in challenging the IRS scam; Do you have lawful "income" subject to taxation by government?
We have all been led to believe that, "of course, my wages are "income," however, as you will soon discover, that is a lie. We have been presuming wages are income but have you ever you actually proven that belief? We have all been deceived on this fact, among many others, and there is only ONE way to prove that, and that is by looking at the actual evidence long suppressed.
The question of "what is income," along with many other questions, have been presented to the lower courts, and all have rejected the questions, and ignored the plain evidence, calling the challenges "frivolous." Now, in this Supreme Court case, (www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileNam...ketfiles/12-6169.htm), they can't ignore it any longer without violating their oaths of office, and their duty to Americans across this country to uphold their own past rulings and constitutional law.
So, let's say I tell you that you owe me $10,000 for work I did for you, and send you a bill. Would you pay it? Why not? Of course, you'd fight that because you know you don't owe it, and yet, we have all accepted without question the presumption that all we bring in as wages is "income" and that we owe tax on this. Is this the truth?
Well, let's address this in a few simple Supreme Court cases to set the stage, and YOU decide for yourself if you want to know more, and discover that you have lawful, constitutional authority to stop the pillaging of your monies. Is that a fair request?
We have all been led to believe that "income" is our wages, salary or compensation for services. Our parents and grandparents have accepted this social propaganda, and believed it without question. Why should we question it when everyone accepts it as fact?
A business or corporation can deduct all costs to be able to be in business and to make a "profit." The "profit" is what is above and beyond all expenses to pay employees for working, pay their costs for goods sold, electricity, everything that they had to pay for to make it possible to be in business and to actually make a profit.
Question: Does it cost you anything to be able to arrive at work, do the work, and go home? Anything? No, you say? What about gas to get to work? What about food to feed yourself to be able to work? What about a home to live in to be able to sleep, and have the ability to work, or insurance, or whatever costs it takes to keep you functioning as a human being able to work?
Make the connections... there is NO difference between a business expense sheet, and YOURS. Is all that a business brings in, a "profit?" No... they have lots of costs. So why should the IRS, or you, presume that all you bring in is "profit" when the courts don?t support that contention?
"In principle, there can be no difference between the case of selling labor and the case of selling goods." United States Supreme Court, Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. at 558.
The Supreme Court clearly understood that a person?s labor "cost" the person to be able to provide it, just as it costs corporations or businesses money to sell goods. However, the IRS claims your labor is worth nothing, and is all "profit."
"...income; as used in the statute should be given a meaning so as not to include everything that comes in. The true function of the words "gains" and "profits" is to limit the meaning of the word "income." United States Supreme Court, S. Pacific v. Lowe, U.S. 247 F. 330. (1918). (Emphasis added).
Notice "gains" and "profits" are linked to the word "income," limiting what can be defined as "income." So, ask yourself this again; Did it cost you anything to be able to get to work? Yes! So all you receive as "wages" cannot possibly be all "profit," right?
"If there is no gain, there is no income."  ...It [income] is not synonymous with receipts. Simply put, pay from a job is a 'wage,' and wages are not taxable. Congress has taxed income, not compensation." United States Supreme Court Conner v. United States. 303 F. Supp. 1187 (1969) pg. 1191: 47 C.J.S. Internal Revenue 98, Pg. 226. (Emphasis added).
The IRS claims that all you make is "gain," or "profit," but the S.Ct case above states otherwise. Whom do we believe? What is it that you are actually taking home for your labor? All "Gain," all "Income," or something else?
"We must reject in this case...the broad contention submitted in behalf of the Government that all receipts - everything that comes in - are income within the proper definition of the term 'gross income'..." United States Supreme Court Doyle v. Mitchell Brother, Co., 247 US 179 (1918).
Notice the IRS? own code in Section 22 GROSS INCOME:
(a): Gross income includes gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service...
Gains, profits and income are redundant terms, and confuse the lawful definition of what a "profit" is because it is the same thing as income. They all mean the same thing. Defining it in Section 22 gives the false and misleading impression there is a difference between these terms when none exists.
If "gains, profit and income" are the same as "salaries, wages, or compensation," why state "derived from?" One does not "derive" income "FROM" a wage if they lawfully mean the same thing. If wages ARE income already, why use the term "derived from?" The code speaks truth in many cases, but we have to decode their confusion.
"The statute and the statute alone determines what is income to be taxed. It taxes only income "derived" from many different sources; one does not "derive income" by rendering services and charging for them." Edwards v. Keith, 231 F. 110 (2nd Cir. 1916). (Emphasis added).
You render services and are paid a wage in exchange for your service... but that wage is NOT "income" according to original intent. "Derived" income is something completely different. You "derive" income from a source for that income, much like you derive an apple from your apple tree. You don?t consider the branches of the tree to be "income," or you diminish the source for income, and attack the tree itself, causing a loss of potential income.
"The poor man or the man in moderate circumstances does not regard his wages or salary as an income that would have to pay its proportionate tax under this new system." Gov. A.E. Wilson on the Income Tax (16 ) Amendment, N.Y. Times, Part 5, Page 13, February 26, 1911.
It was common knowledge that wages were not considered "income" under original intent.
"The claim that salaries, wages, and compensation for personal services are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual... is without support, either in the language of the Act or in the decisions of the courts construing it... it is not salaries, wages or compensation for personal services that are to be included in gross income. That which is to be included is gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal services." United States Supreme Court, Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 (1930). (Emphasis added).
Sound confusing given what you have been told all your life? Everything the IRS does is confusing and convoluted to deceive. Understanding the fraud can take some time but it is as easy as A, B, C. So, what IS lawful, constitutional "income?"
Simple example. You make a wage. You pay all your expenses. You have some left over "principal," and you invest this in some means, and "derive" some interest from the extra money. THAT is what is lawful income. You are deriving NOTHING from your wages. It is the value of your labor, which costs money.
That being said, this U.S. Supreme Court case is being asked these and many more questions which have never been adjudicated in any court of the land. This isn't an easy 15 minute read, any more than learning to speak another language would take you an hour to master.
If you are tired of the fraud, want to know what your constitutional and lawful rights are, then you NEED to begin educating yourself on this topic, as many others are doing, so that you can stand on the laws there for you, and quit being a government slave to unconstitutional and illegal taxation.
Now, don't get me wrong here. Income taxation is lawful and constitutional, as long as it is on true income. The key is "lawful income."
Now, the facts of this U.S. Supreme Court case to date are these:
1. The IRS attacked me for allegedly not paying what I owe for 4 years of not filing, but deprived me of due process of law to defend my position.
2. I went through 9 federal courts, and am now in the Supreme Court, having filed my writ with application to not have to pay court docket fee of $300, and being allowed to file a much simpler document under less stringent criteria.
3. The court accepted this document, provided a case number for it and docketed it.
4. The IRS had opportunity to respond, but waived its right to respond to my writ. One wonders why it would waive its right to respond to allegations it claims are true, however it seems that it believes the Court will NOT take the case, so they don't have to respond. This lack of response, in any other court would be an automatic default under Rule 55.
5. Documents sent that address this default have NOT been filed in the U.S. Supreme Court as the law requires in all other courts.
6. The U.S. Supreme Court is avoiding this issue in violation of its own laws, and it does NOT "have" to take the case, however, all case precedent in its own court clearly states that they would take constitutional issues which address a huge population.
7. I filed for Motion for reconsideration of the fee issue, but the Court denied this once again, despite its own past rulings stating that all courts were to take "substance" over "form." They have my original document accepted and filed, so they have the substance, but are forcing "form," in order for me to even have a chance at due process.
8. The denial of my application means I now have to pay the court cost of $300, as well as having to redo the writ according to attorney standards (actually printed books) at a cost of about $1500... 40 copies and the original to the Court, three copies to the IRS, and copies for my records.
Of course, it appears they are doing everything in their power to deter me from getting this before them, as they are hugely aware of the ramifications. If they take it, the truth will be exposed. If they do NOT take it, due process has been denied by the highest court in the land, and government can now run roughshod over any one of us as it pleases.
The Courts have a sworn duty to apply law and rules to every one of us, so where they do not, it is treason, and warring against the constitution...
"When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason." Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821). .
"No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it." Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
"The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured liberties." Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616
"The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law." Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137
As much as is possible, this is going out to the true supreme court, that of PUBLIC OPINION, and need to be understood by all Americans. Simply read the questions being addressed to the Court in the documents filed to date at Supreme Court case Documents. Read the evidence, and then YOU decide.
Lastly, if you feel engaged in this in the least, please help support the costs for getting this into the Court, not to mention the costs which will be incurred with having to travel to DC for oral argument should it come to that. This is TOO big of an issue to let this opportunity go because of lack of funds. You can go to foundationfortruthinlaw.org
We, the People, MUST stand on the laws and facts. Prove to yourself the validity of the facts.
This case could change every man, woman and child?s life in our republic if the court does its job of protecting us from such encroachment by government. Be a part of it by simply knowing your rights and some basic law, and pass on to everyone you know.
This will be resisted, of course, but media exposure and public pressure will force them to address these issues, sooner or later. In so doing, and we can bring some of the change we all want.
The Cashless Society is Almost Here – And With Some Very Sinister Implications
Among the long list of items bundled by consensus reality merchants under the banner of ‘conspiracy theory’, is a world without cash – where technocrats rule over the populace, and everything and anything is exchanged via plastic and RFID chips.
In this sterile and controlled Orwellian hi-tech society, the idea of cash being passed from hand to hand would be as archaic as the thought of carrying around a rucksack of tally sticks today.
Still, despite the incredible penetration of credit and debit card transactions into economic aggregate, and the boom in internet shopping, few will comfortably admit that a cashless society is nearly upon us. In part, it’s a natural denial by many fueled by the idea of our society is indeed on a collision course with the sort of dystopic impersonal future like that depicted in the 1970′s sci-fi film classic, ‘Logan’s Run’.
Cashless money is here, and growing rapidly.
Over the years, futurists and commentators alike seemed to agree that a cashless society would be a slow creep, and cash would automatically phase itself in simply by virtue of the sheer volume of electronic transactions that would gradually make paper less available and more costly to redeem and exchange. This is still true for the most part. What few counted on, however, was how the final push would take place, and why. Some will be surprised by these new emerging mechanisms, and the political and sinister implications they will ultimately lead to.
What’s the time frame on all this? Difficult to say, but what is certain is that the initial phases are already in motion…
Introduction of Parallel Currencies
There has been a lot made about the ‘cashless society’ in media, but this cannot fully happen until there is a cashless currency.
Every revolution needs a good crisis in order to germinate its seed. The cashless revolution is no different. It should be abundantly clear by now that the global financial meltdown has been engineered at every juncture of its unfolding by the very private central banks who expand and contract the money supply. A dollar or euro collapse will trigger a global economic crisis, which is a prime opportunity to introduce the next phase.
In the summer of 2012, at the height of the European Central Bank (ECB) ritualistic raping of the Greek economy, financial expert Max Keiser, alongside Mexican billionaire Hugo Salinas Price, traveled to Athens to promote the idea of a silver Drachma as a parallel currency to the ever-failing euro. In theory and in practice, this parallel currency was ‘sound money’ for individual Greeks and would allow them to retain some say in their financial destiny, and also allow them to accumulate real wealth. It should have caught on. But this great idea did not go down well with media moguls and technocratic elites loyal to their overlords in the ECB, Wall Street and the City of London. Still, too many people remain unaware of how money is created, entered into circulation and how their private central banks control inflation, and Greece is no different.
Watch this clip from Greek television:
The US dollar is pure fiat, but it does have a theoretical backer. It is an oil-backed currency – and for better of for worse, it’s on its way to losing its long-lived status as the world’s reserve currency. There are signals that China is moving towards a gold-backed currency and has already agreed to buy the majority of its oil supply from Russia off of the US dollar peg. This could mean two things: the US could be forced to fight a war to maintain dollar supremacy, or the dollar will begin to drop as the top dog. This shift will open up a window of opportunity for money masters to insert not only a brand new global currency, but also its universal cashless attributes as well.
Common sense and free market wisdom would expect to see a sound money option replace the current fiat disaster, but as we saw in Greece, a great solution was not taken up and straddled with the dysfunctional euro, that society will continue to pay the cost of that reality.
The euro crisis was a great opportunity to throw out the euro in favour of something that could create wealth, rather than debt. As the fiat currencies continue to slide downhill, globalist are preparing their solution behind closed doors.
Enter the Cashless Currency…
It’s arguable that we approaching the cusp of that US Dollar collapse, and perhaps a Euro implosion on the back end of it. Risks of hyper inflation are very real here, but if you control the money supply might already have a ready-made solution waiting in the wings, you will not be worrying about the rift, only waiting for the chaos to ensue so as to maximise your own booty from the crisis.
Many believed that the global currency would be the SDR unit, aka Special Drawing Rights, implemented in 2001 as a supplementary foreign exchange reserve asset maintained by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). SDRs were not considered a full-fledged currency, but rather a claim to currency held by IMF member countries for which they may be exchanged for dollars, euros, yen or other central bankers’ fiat notes.
With the SDR confined to the upper tier of the international money launderette, a new product is still needed to dovetail with designs of a global cashless society.
Two new parallel currencies are currently being used exclusively within the electronic, or cashless domain – Bitcoin and Ven.
Among the many worries Ben Bernanke listed in his speech at the New York Economic Club last week was the emergence of Bitcoin. But don’t believe for a second that these digital parallel currencies are not being watched over and even steered by the money masters. Couple this latest trend with done deals by most of the world’s largest mobile networks this month to allow people to pay via a mobile ‘wallet’, and you now have the initial enabler for a new global electronic currency.
These new parallel cashless currencies could very quickly end up in pole position for supremacy when the old fiat notes fade away as a result of the next planned economic dollar and euro crisis.
Both Bitcoin and Ven appear on their surface to be independent parallel digital money systems, but the reality is much different. In April 2011, Ven announced the first commodity trade priced in Ven for gold production between Europe and South America. Both of these so-called ‘digital alternatives’ are being backed and promoted through some of the world’s biggest and most long-standing corporate dynasties, including Rothschild owned Reuters as an example, which should be of interest to any activist who believes that a digitally controlled global currency is a dangerous path to tread down.
The Electronic Deutsche Mark
Much is made of Germany’s prominent financial position within the EU, with a popular talking point being that, “Germany is carrying the majority of the load in ‘bailing out’ countries such as Greece in the south”. If the Euro is ‘heading south’ as many a financial commentator are claiming, then how would a country like Germany – or even the US Federal Reserve for that matter, hedge their bets with an impending currency collapse looming just over the horizon?
Economics professor Miles Kimball from the University of Michigan thinks he knows the answer:
“In short, for a smooth transition, a reintroduced mark needs to be an electronic mark. I recently made the case for the electronic dollar in a previous Quartz column, “E-Money: How paper currency is holding the US recovery back.” The trouble with paper money is that the rate of interest people earn on holding paper money puts a floor on the interest rate they are willing to accept in doing any other lending. For the US, I proposed making the electronic dollar the “unit of account” or economic yardstick for prices and other economic values, and having the Federal Reserve control the exchange rate between electronic dollars and paper dollars to make paper dollars gradually fall in value relative to electronic dollars during periods of time when the Fed wants room to make the interest rate negative.
In the case of Germany, there would be no need to reintroduce a paper mark along with the electronic mark, since the euro itself could continue in its current role as a “medium of exchange” for making purchases in Germany, alongside the electronic mark. A “crawling peg” exchange rate could be used to let the electronic mark gradually go up in value relative to the euro, without causing a huge rush into the mark, since with no paper mark other than the euro itself, interest rates in Germany could be close to zero when measured in euros, which would make them strongly negative in terms of marks.”
A dollar or euro crash could be the perfect storm for the introduction of a major global digital currencies, and this will do nothing but fast-track our entry into the new cashless society.
This past year’s Summer Olympic was a beta testing exercise for a number of new programs. We witnessed troops deployed en mass for the first time to marshal the international sporting event and new facial recognition technology tested to monitor its attendees. One of the chief sponsors of London 2012 Olympic was VISA, used the event as a springboard to launch its new ‘contactless payment’ technology, acclimatising the international public to making routine payments via smartphones. VISA now predicts that this new method will carry 50 per cent of its transaction volume by the year 2020.
Mastercard has also rolled out its own version called Paypass, and Barclaycard has already implemented its own mobile phone payment chip in 2011. It conceivable here, that a bank like Barclays could one day takeover a major mobile service provider in order to streamline the endless profits it could accrue from monopolising cashless payment facilities for its customers. A recent edition of Marketing Week further explains how this is program is being rolled out:
“Barclays launched Pingit this year, a mobile payment service that allows customers to send and receive money with a mobile phone number, which has sparked The Payments Council to work on a similar project. And the three leading mobile operators in the UK – EE, Vodafone and O2 – are working on a joint project under the name Weve, one of the aims of which is to develop standardised technology for ‘digital wallets’ on mobile.
These industry innovations reflect the changing attitude and behaviour by consumers to cashless payments. Barry Clark, account director at Future Foundation, which identified the trend towards a cashless society in its recent report into the changing face of payments, explains that this move towards digital is a “banking nirvana” for brands, since replacing cash with electronic payments takes high costs out of the system.”
These mobile enablers will effectively cover the small services and contractor’s market for the cashless society. In addition, digital payment terminals like iZettle and Square (created by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey), have brought in most small traders, including taxi drivers, plumbers etc, and street side retailers – meaning that the barrier for entry into the new cashless society has been effectively dissolved.
The Socialist ‘Oyster’
The darker aspect of a cashless society, is one which few are debating or discussing, but is actually the most pivotal in terms of scial engineering and transforming communities and societies. In London, the electronic touch payment Oyster Card was introduced in 2003, initially for public transport, and since that time the card has been co-opted to be used for other functions, as the UK beta tests the idea of an all-in-one cashless lifestyle solution.
Ironically, and alongside biometric chipping now in India, it’s the United States, supposedly the birthplace of modern capitalism, who is beta testing its own socialist technocracy. As the ranks of the poor and unemployed grow and dollar inflation rises in America, more and more people are dependent on traditional ‘Food Stamp’ entitlements in order to feed their families. The US has now introduced its own socialist ‘Oyster’ to replace the old Food Stamp program. It’s called the ‘EBT’, which stands for “Electronic Benefit Transfer“, as a means of transferring money from the central government to people living below the poverty line. Advocate Mike Adams for Natural News describes it another way:
“EBT benefits have more than doubled during the Obama administration’s last four years, creating tens of millions of new dependents who now vote based almost entirely on who gives them the most handouts.
The purchase of vitamins is specifically prohibited by the EBT program. This is done as a way to keep EBT recipients sick and diseased while suffering from nutritional deficiencies, which is precisely what the federal government wants.
EBT cards create high-profit handouts to corporations, too: Pharmaceutical companies and the sick-care industry; Big Government which gets re-elected based on entitlement handouts; global banks which earn a percentage off every swipe; and even the processed junk food industry which preys upon nutritional ignorance of the poor.
In fact, for every dollar’s worth of food handed out to EBT recipients under the program, at least 50 cents is driven right into the profit coffers of wealthy corporations.”
Adams has pointed out the endgame here. Where collectivist technocrats are concerned, a global digital currency is not only a means for a centrally controlled economy, but also a centrally controlled society. And as Adams also pointed out, they can even control what you eat.
There’s also the small matter of the Verichip, or ‘class 2′ implantable medical devise, an RFID chip already set to be implemented through Obamacare. It will transmit medical records, bank accounts, keyless entry and much more. The technology could be a $100 Trillion industry over the coming decade.
Bottom line: We’ve got a big problem when the state can – and will cut-off your electronic financial lifeline should you fall foul of the system. No negotiations, no gray areas – and definitely no place for a free individual in this type of globalist system.
Social Networks Gradually Supplanting Real Communities
In 2011 Facebook launched its own virtual currency, which was taken up immediately by the games developer industry. Facebook created it’s own internal digital market overnight. If customers didn’t like it, they had two choices – jump ship, or stay in the biggest market place. That’s a lot of power to wield, and you can wield it if you have the big numbers.
A severe lack of choice in the world of online communities has unwittingly(or not) positioned Facebook to play the roles of not only data collector, but also as banker, retailer, archivist and governor.
As 2012 comes to a close, many people have certainly become, in one way or another, sans border citizens of the Facebook Nation. In the future, one corporation or cartel’s success in capturing a near global monopoly of membership to a particular online platform might give it the ability to dictate a digital economic mandate to both producers and consumer.
The digital data industry now claims in a recent study by fast.MAP, that consumer confidence in sharing personal information has risen. But the reality is that most people do not know which data is being used and to who it is being shared or sold to. Most users are unknowingly trading “access” to networks, as well convenient speed of registration – for data privacy. We do this on a daily basis now.
It’s a question of speculation at this point how deeply the new digital currencies will be integrated into social networking giants like Facebook, or Second Life - where users are already buying virtual property with virtual currency, but few can deny that the potential for consolidation in the early 21st century is already there.
History Will Repeat Itself
Whenever the status quo is seen as a failure, the architects of society will rarely allow the whole show to come to a grinding halt, for fear that new and non-centrally controlled organic systems of organisation will emerge. The ruling establishment will spare no opportunity to tell society this, over and over, making people truly believe that it is in their best interest to adopt whatever alternative is handed down to them. This is why, when faced with a crisis, society will almost always seek to implement a parallel alternatives, rather than rethink the whole system.
In 2008, the public had an opportunity to collapse the predatory banking system that has been trading insolvent and gambling on thin air. But the very same ruling establishment who engineered the crisis to begin with, masterfully presented their own solution as the remedy by establishing the precedent of the state bailing out any gambling losses incurred by the banking community.
In the end society relented, and with help of pro-banking political leadership on both sides of the Atlantic, they adopted the pre-packaged belief that a cluster of bloated and corrupt financial institutions were simply too big to fail. Aside from being a massive redistribution of wealth upwards into the hands of the speculative elite classes, this was merely a test by the establishment to see how far they could go in robbing the public, pushing up inflation, hoovering up real assets, robbing pension funds and enslaving taxpayers to generations of debt the bankers created – all in one swoop.
It has long been the dream of collectivists and technocratic elites to eliminate the semi-unregulated cash economy and black markets in order to maximise taxation and to fully control markets. If the cashless society is ushered in, they will have near complete control over the lives of individual people.
The financial collapse which began in 2007-2008 was merely the opening gambit of the elite criminal class, a mere warm-up for things to come. With the next collapse we may see a centrally controlled global digital currency gaining its final foothold.
The cashless society is already here. The question now is – how far will society allow it to penetrate and completely control each and every aspect of their day to day lives
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants, but debt is the money of slaves.
This document contains valuable information on the STRAWMAN, one's ALL CAPS NAME. It talks a bit about the Federal Reserve, the nature of money, and the Uniform Commercial Code. Very important if you're interested in Strawman Redemption.
I - GOVERNMENT FALSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION WITHIN THE PUBLIC RECORD
Your State Is; And Has Been For Years, Ripping You Off...
THE ONLY WAY TO BE FREE IS TO TERMINATE THE CONTRACTS... AND EVEN THEN; THE TRAITORS STILL MAY NOT RESPECT THE LAW.
Let's start with this: Money has two factors that define it. It is a thing of beauty if you're mathematically or even poetically inclined, because it's not one and it's not three. There are two specific factors that indicate anything is money and they are:
It has to have intrinsic value; and
It can't vary in quality.
That's it. Everything in creation that has these two conditions, is money. Everything that doesn't, isn't.
Gold and silver have always been considered money in the history of mankind in all cultures because they meet the two conditions, plus they're handy. Actually, every element in the chemistry table of elements other than carbon is money. Water is money. The only reason you don't see people carrying gallons of water to the store to pay for things is because it's not handy.
Diamonds aren't money because, though they have intrinsic value, they vary in quality.
Federal Reserve Notes are not money because they don't have any intrinsic value. They cost two cents to make regardless of denomination. That's an obvious shocker to a lot of people - the fact that someone actually makes a 98 cent profit on every dollar bill; a $99.98 profit on every $100 bill.
Presuming it is the government that does this (actually it's not - the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express - more on that at another time), one might wonder why it (the government) needs so much money in taxes, license & permit fees, citations, fines & penalties and confiscations, and all the other perhaps subtler methods it uses to remove us from our property.
Federal Reserve Notes are negotiable instruments that discharge debt, but they are not money. They are not backed by silver anymore like they were in the days of the silver certificates, nor are they backed by any other commodity that meets the definition of money. The collateral for Federal Reserve Notes is the future labor of the people of the United States as evidenced by the birth certificates. That's a very loaded sentence that we will go into more in a minute, but one of the keywords is future. In other words it doesn't exist now, it may exist later. So Federal Reserve notes are in that category of negotiable instruments called "promises to pay" or promissory notes. They are debt instruments.
In reality, we can't actually pay any debts anymore because all of the real money has been extracted from society. All we can do now is discharge debts. All we have to do is use this fake money or counterfeit money. Federal Reserve Notes are counterfeit money.
You may have noticed that there are so many other examples of real things that have pretty much been replaced by their fake counterparts in the past few generations. Prior to this century, for instance, the only kind of food that existed was real - now it is quite a challenge to go into a regular grocery store and buy any food that has not been polluted by chemicals, insecticides, genetic engineering or over-processing to an incredible extent. Some people don't even know that real maple syrup comes from a tree. The brown sugar water with chemicals in it that you are served in the House of Pancakes may look like syrup, but it isn't.
In a similar fashion, and just like we used to have real money rather than fake money, we used to have real laws (implementing regulations), rather than fake laws like Codes (color of law) that are only applicable to corporate fictions. We also used to have real titles to property rather than fake titles like deeds (color of title). If you really own your land and have an allodial title to it, you are not subject to building codes or property taxes. If you only have a deed, the STATE really owns your land, and if you don't pay the rent (property taxes), they will take it away from you. You can be assured that Mr. Rockefeller has real title to his property.
There are two of so many things these days - one that is real and one that is fake.
There are two "states" of whatever state you live in. There is one that has hills and valleys and rocks and trees and dogs and cats and people in it. There is another one that is a government entity, a corporate fiction. When you fill out a government form that asks you "Are you a resident of the State of Connecticut?", you may presume you know what is meant by the word "resident" and the phrase "State of Connecticut", but you should be sure before you sign that thing under penalty of perjury.
In the same way, there are in a way two of you. The real you was created by your mother and father and God, and if somebody pinches, you will feel it. There is another "you", believe it or not, that was created by the STATE and is a corporate fiction.
Have you ever noticed that whenever you receive a letter from a creditor or debt collector or IRS, it's always addressed to your name in all capital letters? Well, that's because that letter is not addressed to you but to your STRAWMAN. On your personal checks issued to you by your bank, your name and address are imprinted in all capital letters for the same reason.
You may decide you want to have the best mailbox on your block, so you design and construct and paint this fabulous mailbox and you take it out in front of your mansion and you pound it in to the ground on your property. Who owns that mailbox? If one of your neighbors puts a letter in that mailbox that does not have a stamp on it, they can be fined or imprisoned for trespassing on government property.
In the same way, you may have a birth certificate in your possession - it has your name on it - you've had it for decades - you value it - you keep it in your box of important documents. Guess who owns that birth certificate. Of course, it is the STATE who own that birth certificate. At the very best, you may get a certified copy. The original is always kept in the Bureau of Vital Records in the State you were born, in the Department of Commerce. Do you know why in the Department of Commerce? Because your birth certificate, along with all the other birth certificates, is the collateral for Federal Reserve Notes.
Effectively, your birth certificate is the STATE's certificate of title over you.
Now, how did you become chattel property of the STATE (being as the Constitution supposedly forbids slavery)? The short answer is by deceit and trickery. The STATE created a corporate fiction, your STRAWMAN with that birth certificate, and as long as you don't know the difference between that STRAWMAN and you the real, live human being, the least common denominator is the STRAWMAN.
When you're driving on the street, perhaps at a higher speed than the posted so-called speed limit, but you haven't done any personal or property damage, the reason a cop can stop you, hand you a bill at gun point, and deny your rights to travel and due process in one fell swoop, is because the cop is not dealing with you the real, live human being, but only with the STRAWMAN.
Remember we were taught back in the 8th Grade that there are three branches of government - the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative? Well, where does the DMV or the IRS fit into that? They don't. They're in what some people have come to call the quasi-Fourth branch of government - the Administrative agencies. The Administrative agencies would like you to believe they have legislative authority over you. They don't. The only authority or jurisdiction they can claim to have is in commerce, by contract, over corporate fictions.
The real you has God-given rights. It doesn't matter whether you live in a country with a Constitution that supposedly protects those rights or not. You have God-given rights just by being here. The fake "you", the corporate fiction or STRAWMAN, doesn't have any God-given rights, only benefits and obligations under contract, and maybe "civil rights", a poor substitute (fake) for real rights.
Civil rights may be politically correct, but they are counter to nature and real rights. For instance it may be a civil right not to be discriminated against because you have a pointy nose, but the deeper (real, God-given) right is the right to associate with anyone you want to and not to have to associate in any way with anyone you don't want to. If you don't want to hire pointy nosed people just because you don't like pointy nosed people, that is your God-given right.
God-given rights include the rights to livelihood, property, travel, due process, sovereignty, happiness and health. These are not STATE privileges.
Knowledge really is power. It is important to know the difference between what is real and what is fake, and it is also good to know the rules. There are Constitutional experts in jail because they didn't understand how they had contracted away their God-given rights in exchange for STATE privileges. It's important to be familiar with the Uniform Commercial Code, because this is the real rules on planet Earth.
One of the ten basic maxims of Commercial law is this: "An unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true". What this means is that whenever you get a bill, a fine, a penalty, assessment, or demand or presentment in commerce of any sort, it behooves you to respond to it timely, because if you don't - if you ignore it, you acquiesce to the truth of it. You loose your due process, and it may not have been true at all in the first place.
The better way to play the commerce game is to respond timely and request that your adversary respond timely to you as well. Oftentimes it is ridiculously easy to pull the rug out from under an IRS agent or a debt collector simply by making a righteous formal request that they cannot or will not respond to.
Did you know that there is no law that makes it mandatory for any real, live human being to pay income taxes, have income taxes withheld from one's pay, or even file tax returns? How could there be? It is an obvious fact, and the Supreme Court has ruled very clearly that when you file an income tax return, you are waiving your 5th Amendment Right to not testify against yourself. Certainly there can be no law that makes it mandatory that anyone waive any rights.
When many people get an inquiry from IRS asking them where their tax return is, they panic and ignore it, and six weeks later they get an unsigned assessment that contains added in fines and penalties – they’re on the way to being liened or levied. [Actually, the IRS never sends out real liens - only "Notices" of liens, but they usually get the County Recorders to treat them as real liens anyway.]
When you get a letter from IRS asking you where your tax return is, you might write back very humbly, simply and immediately and give them Power of Attorney to complete your tax return for you as long as they sign it under penalty of perjury - you may never hear from them again.
Another way to illustrate using the maxim "An unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true" is also an easy way to explain one approach to terminating unsecured debt.
Did you know that banks do not issue loans? This is a shocker to many people, because we are taught to believe that if we want a loan, we go to a bank. But banks don't issue loans and there is no asterisk on that sentence. Banks are prohibited from loaning their customer's assets because that would violate General Accounting principles. They are prohibited from loaning their own assets because that would violate Federal Reserve Regulations. What's left? Nothing. Banks don't issue loans.
What happens is when you leave the bank with a credit card application or another type of co-called loan application, you are actually giving the bank your promise to pay them with your signature on it. It could be on a piece of toilet paper. It is a promissory note that the bank cashes, and in a simple example, gives you a check of equal value in return. They don't disclose that there wasn't really any loan or any risk or collateral on their part and that they merely paid a clerk $12 an hour or so to make an entry in a computer. [This is what causes inflation because the so-called money is created out of thin air.] Then they (the banks) violate usury and racketeering laws all day every day by charging you principle and interest on the fictitious "loan".
One way to terminate this unsecured debt, without bankruptcy, is: when your STRAWMAN gets the bill, send in a minimum payment with a cover letter that says at the top "Notice of Final Payment". In this half a page cover letter, make a formal request in commerce, that they (the so-called creditor) answer your question, and your question is where was the risk or the collateral for that so-called loan.
Well, again, there was no loan; there was no risk, and there was no collateral. They can't answer that question, and you end up creating a new contract in which your STRAWMAN doesn't owe them anything anymore that replaces the old contract in which your STRAWMAN might have owed them thousands of dollars. This new contract is called a novation.
Evading responsibility is not being advocated by these prior statements. Certainly if you have made a mess, it is up to you to clean it up. But if the mess you've made is a merely a mirage, it is appropriate to handle it by mirage means.
Step by step over the last few decades, the substance of our money, our laws, our rights and our freedoms have been overlayed by something resembling but counter to these precious things.
Our society has become a tyrannical police state. Still however, it is our ability to be truly free human beings because it is our birthright - it just takes more knowledge then ever, and action, to step out of the negative spell that has been cast by the conspiratorial powers that be.
The laying of the groundwork to one's freedom and sovereignty requires dotting all of the "i"s and crossing all of the "t"s and at least three steps:
Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the holder-in-due-course of it. This is the single most important tool in your toolbag because this alone changes the presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;
Making yourself the Power of Attorney over the corporate fiction; and
Copyrighting the STRAWMAN's name. This doesn't just give you another defensive strategy - it gives you a very important offensive weapon, because from this point on, anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything without your permission is trespassing on your commercial property. You've possibly heard of the term "judicial immunity" a judge has, or so-called "unlimited immunity" a clerk or a cop or an IRS agent has protected by his or her agency. Well, it hardly exists at all. The only immunity any agent has is when they are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction over you the real live person.
When you know the difference between who you are and who you've been led to believe you are (a corporate fiction) and how to effectively assert this difference, the scales of justice are unlocked and the balance of power tilts back to your favor.
Your State Pledged Your Body to a Bank
Birth and marriage certificates are now "warehouse receipts," printed on banknote paper, that marks you and yours as 'chattel' property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.
A certificate is a "paper establishing an ownership claim." - Barron's Dictionary of Banking Terms. Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.
Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called "warehouse receipts." The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descirbed at 7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are:
- the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored...(residence)
- the date of issue of the receipt.....("Date issued")
- the consecutive number of the receipt...(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)
- a description of the goods or of the packages containing them...(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)
- the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent...(municipal clerk or state registrar's signature).
Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as "warehouse receipts" under the Uniform Commercial Code. Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:
warehouse receipt. "...A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security."
Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks. The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt. That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources," that is.
Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis. This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.
How To Proceed When Stopped By A TRAITOR/Law Enforcement Officer.
Power can never be delegated which the authority delegating never possessed itself. N.J. Steam Co. V. Merchant Bank, 47 U.S. 344, 407
In General: The following matters are applicable when stopped by any law enforcement officer and are relevant whether no tag or any private tag is being displayed upon the motor vehicle or whether the vehicle is registered with the state agency which deals in such matters and all documents are in order, or the registration has expired, has been revoked, or whatever. Driving license and registration are irrelevant if the vehicle is not being used in a motoring activity on the public roadways which the state legislature presumptively has authority to regulate.
Remember: Relax and be pleasant. Forgive the officer because he is probably as linguistically, politically and jurally illiterate, ignorant and incompetent as your next door neighbor. If he respects your rights, you will be on your way. If he does not, and you know how to assert them, then you will see him, his supervisors and their attorneys in court and you will win there.
You are a sovereign member of a community of sovereigns all of whom have an unalienable right to travel. Therefore, it is appropriate to behave as a sovereign member of the American nation rather than as a bond-slave or whatever other kind of 2nd class citizen allegedly subject to the will of an elitist class operating by and through their puppet instrument: the metaphysical and all too mythic entity often evoked as The State in all it's fulsome, transcendental, de facto, corpora ficta glory.
Basic Elements: When the officer asks you his first question, it is imperative to answer his question by putting him on good faith notice that you do not voluntarily consent to being detained and, then, posing to him your own questions. If you do not personally establish by your own statement that you do not agree to be stopped, then you are said to allow a presumption to be created that you do agree to being detained.
After you state that you do not agree to being stopped and detained, you must ask the officer if he is detaining you. If the officer answers he is not detaining you, then you must inform him that you will be on your way.
If the officer answers that he is detaining you, then you must ask the officer does he have a well founded probable cause that you have committed a crime known to the people's common law as his basis for detaining you and that you expect a good faith answer from him. If the officer states he has no such well founded probable cause, then you must inform him that you will be on your way.
If the officer states that he does have a well founded probable cause, it had better be connected to your committing some felony crime against the people or breach of the peace known to the common law of which he has knowledge. If his probable cause proves to be merely connected with The State's traffic regulatory-related administrative law scheme, to include any local traffic regulatory-related ordinance, then he is violating your sovereign right to life, liberty and property and by his detaining you he is holding you under false arrest and false imprisonment pursuant to the common law. Of course, if at the same time you are stopped you really are a party subject to the administrative law or ordinance he thinks you have violated, then his probable cause may have a legal basis. But unless you are stopped while driving a school bus or some similar state employee activity, the odds are slim indeed that you are subject to your state's traffic regulatory scheme. Recognize that there are constitutional arguments which will defeat a traffic law violation charge no matter the circumstances.
Should the officer detain you without stating any probable cause reason after you proper good faith demand or can only claim some administrative law violation without being able to show his probable cause grounds why he thinks you are subject to it, then he is proceeding under color of office. He is using color of process. This is proceeding under color of law. Tort damages and civil rights violations-related damages are in the making.
Remember that an officer may have just cause for stopping you, for example, if you are proceeding the wrong way down a one-way street, or the like. You have a duty and an obligation to observe the customs and rules of the road. No one is above the law - not even law enforcement officers, prosecutors and judges.
Every stop must be handled with the specific circumstances of the particular stop borne in mind. But in every case, if you truly understand the law, you need not become the victim of quasi police authority.
Script: A typical first statement from an officer runs to the effect: LET ME SEE YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE, REGISTRATION & PROOF OF INSURANCE. Or it could be: SO HOW IS YOUR AUNT RUBY?
Whatever his first statement is, your answer is: OFFICER, I DO NOT CONSENT TO YOUR DETAINING ME. ARE YOU DETAINING ME?
He must acknowledge your statement and answer your question. Of course, he may ignore your statement and question and proceed in jack boot fashion. This will be a mistake for him as he is already violating your due process of law right to know if you are being detained. If he says: NO, I AM NOT DETAINING YOU, then he has a serious problem if he insists on asking any further questions or is in any way holding you up. At this point, it is appropriate for you to say: THEN, I AM FREE TO GO. IS THAT NOT CORRECT? He is now on the spot and must agree, whereupon you are on your way.
Of course, he may catch himself and say: NO, YOU ARE NOT FREE TO GO. This would be the same outcome as if he first answered with: YES, I AM DETAINING YOU. But at this point he has created a problem for himself. This is an issue of his training. Does he understand what it means to detain someone? Does he understand that any time he stops someone he is detaining them? Does he understand that if he says he is not detaining you, then you are free to go? Does he understand that as a law enforcement officer it is a legal absurdity to argue he is not detaining a person, yet they are not free to go? You must understand this kind of thing and bring it to his attention. You must understand how to get it over to him that he and his supervisors will be held accountable for the fact that he doesn't understand how to conduct himself as a police officer.
For now, we will proceed by your moving to establish the nature of his business by asking a question along the following lines: THEN, TELL ME OFFICER, ARE YOU DETAINING ME BECAUSE YOU HAVE PERSONALLY WITNESSED MY COMMITTING A MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY CRIME KNOWN TO THE PEOPLE'S COMMON LAW OR IS IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE A GOOD PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE I HAVE COMMITTED SUCH A MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY CRIME? WHAT IS THE CRIME YOU BELIEVE I HAVE COMMITTED AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT? AND WHAT ARE YOUR GROUNDS FOR PROBABLE CAUSE?
You have put him on the spot, whether he fully realizes it or not. If he cannot name a misdemeanor or felony crime known to the common law which are the kinds of crimes which can be committed against the people of the state, then he has a problem if he does not let you go. For all that is left for him now is to name some statutory crime created by the state legislature by way of enactment of some regulatory law, but which has no origin in our common law. In the instant case, we must assume that it likely pertains to the traffic regulatory law scheme.
Most likely he will evade answering your question by asking his own questions as though he were the only one with the right or authority to ask questions and you were the only one with a duty to answer whatever questions he chooses to ask and to answer them the way he expects them to be answered. Such is the nature of his training. Probably he really doesn't know he is a state political trustee with a duty and obligation to answer your questions.
Therefore, he is likely to ignore your question and respond now with a statement such as: LET ME SEE YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE, REGISTRATION & PROOF OF INSURANCE or YOU ARE DISPLAYING AN IMPROPER TAG. No matter what his statement, his actions relate to his presumptions you are engaged in a driving activity which requires you produce a so-called valid, state agency-issued driver license and vehicle registration along with evidence of current vehicle insurance whenever he detains you and asks for these documents. It will not matter why you were initially stopped. Understand that whether you have all the proper documents or none of them, that if you are engaged in no regulatable activity at the time of the stop, then the body of administrative law pertaining regulation pertains to a jurisdiction foreign to you.
Of course, the officer probably doesn't have a clue about any of this. Therefore, no matter what course things take at this point, you must put the officer on his good faith notice. This means informing him you proceed in good faith and you require that he proceed in good faith and that if he fails to do so, the necessary conclusion will be he proceeds in bad faith contrary to his duty as a public servant with self evident intent to irreparably harm, damage and injure you. You say: OFFICER, BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER, I MUST GIVE YOU MY GOOD FAITH NOTICE. FIRSTLY, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW AND THAT YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO OBEY THE LAW AS I AM?
If he answers YES to your question, then state: WELL OFFICER, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE TRAFFIC REGULATORY LAWS OF THIS STATE ARE ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS AND THAT I AM PRESENTLY ENGAGED IN NO REGULATABLE DRIVING ACTIVITY WHICH CAN POSSIBLY MAKE ME SUBJECT TO THOSE LAWS?
Of course, he doesn't have a clue here either. His training never included such facts. Therefore, you will again have to remind him of his good faith obligation to level with you and admit he doesn't know.
At this point it is appropriate to present him with a copy of your Good Faith Notice by Actual and Constructive Notice (see Vol. 2, Appendix C) and tell him to review it. Explain to him that having been put on actual and constructive notice regarding the law he presumes to enforce and his good faith obligations as a state political trustee, he will later have no affirmative defense that he didn't know the law or that in good faith he charged you with violating various provisions of said laws anyway.
Ask him: OFFICER, DID YOU SWEAR TO UPHOLD THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS? He must say YES. If he says NO, that makes things worse for his supervisors. Ditto if he evades answering altogether.
Then ask him: OFFICER, HAVE YOU READ AND DID YOU UNDERSTAND THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS AS PART OF YOUR TRAINING? This is another critical question. Do not be surprised to learn that his training included nothing about the state and federal constitutions. Then say: OFFICER, AM I TO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF OUR WRITTEN STATE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS OF OUR FEDERAL CONSTITUTION HOLD PRIMACY OVER ALL OTHER ARTICLES? AM I TO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THERE CAN BE NO LAW MAKING OR RULE MAKING WHICH DEROGATE OR ABROGATE THE UNALIENABLE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE?
Your state's law enforcement officers receive no training whatsoever regarding the laws to which we are all equally subject. As far as they are concerned, constitutional government does not exist. Most of the training they receive is based upon presumptions of authority which simply do not exist, including presumptions that every citizen is subject to the state and federal fourth branch of (quasi-) government schemes which your state and national political trustee legislators presume to have power to create.
If he cites administrative law to you, remind him that you are not engaged in any driving activity which is subject to the regulatory authority of the agency charged with administering and enforcing that administrative law and that furthermore it is self evident from the face of the state constitution that the traffic regulatory agency was never constitutionally sanctioned either to exist even in title or to perform any administrative or enforcement functions.
If the officer continues with his business of detaining you, then it is appropriate to say to him: IF YOU ARE DETAINING ME, THEN, AS A SOVEREIGN AMERICAN CITIZEN, I HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT IS YOUR PROBABLE CAUSE. IF YOU ARE DETAINING ME, THEN YOU ARE HOLDING ME UNDER ARREST AS FAR AS COMMON LAW IS CONCERNED. IN GOOD FAITH I ASK YOU (AND THEREFORE IN GOOD FAITH ARE YOU OBLIGATED TO DIRECTLY RESPOND) WHAT IS THE CRIME YOU BELIEVE I HAVE COMMITTED AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA?
If the officer still proceeds with obvious intent to write you up on one or more traffic violations, then, before he does, it is appropriate for you to state and ask: BY DETAINING ME AGAINST MY WILL, YOU ARE ARRESTING ME. BY THE ISSUE OF A CITATION YOU ARE ALLEGING I HAVE COMMITTED VIOLATIONS OF LAW WHICH CLEARLY HAVE NO FORCE AND EFFECT OF LAW ON SEVERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW DEFECT GROUNDS WHICH I HAVE ENUMERATED IN THE GOOD FAITH NOTICE BY ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND WHICH YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE LATER TO SAY YOU WERE NOT ON ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE REGARDING THESE JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT ISSUES. I MEAN NO DISRESPECT TO YOU, AND I UNDERSTAND THE DIFFICULTY OF YOUR JOB, BUT YOU ARE ON NOTICE THAT YOU PROCEED IN NO OFFICIAL CAPACITY.
If the officer writes you up, it is appropriate for you to write on the ticket before he separates copies: NO CONSENT TO DETENTION. If the officer will not allow you to write such a statement, that is OK, because you are later going to write up an Affidavit of Truth & Facts which you are going to file with the Clerk of Court in the case, and you will indicate there that the officer did not allow you to write your statement.
Conclusion: Always remember your duties and obligations as a sovereign American motorist on the public roadways to observe the customs and rules of the road. At the common law, you are accountable for your actions while driving. Should you cause injury to life, limb or property of another, and following judicial proceedings conducted pursuant to your right to due process of law it is found that you are at fault, you should be prepared to make restitution to the injured party.
The role of the sovereign American motorist does not include a ticket for a free ride in the state of anarchy which the legal sophisticators have been so diligently constructing for generations for and on behalf of their elitist class masters.
The State's quasi traffic regulatory schemes are built upon metaphysical constructs which are in direct conflict with American constitutional government. These schemes are justified and promoted using a 180 degree twist of legal metaphysical calculus to an argument that without these fourth branch of government schemes there would be anarchy on the streets and highways.
These arguments are, as much as anything else, smoke and mirrors to justify a police state upon the premise that people are no damn good and will only act responsibly when traveling if they fear they will be penalized by fines and imprisonment administered and enforced by the wizards, lackeys and stooges of The State instead of having to answer to the people in a proper judicial power court when they flagrantly disobey the common law rules of the road.
These traffic regulatory schemes, from the beginning, provided a ready forum for extortion, kickback, payoff and mutual back scratching schemes. Paramount among these schemes has been the evolutionary development of mandatory automobile insurance coverage, and the business of legal representation by members of private lawyering associations and syndicates whenever a motorist finds him or herself caught in the web of these traffic regulatory schemes.
Only the naive can take at face value the proposition that the traveling world can be a better place for everyone only where the rights to life, liberty, property, privacy, livelihood and due process of law of every motorist is controlled, managed, and generally abridged or abrogated, which is to say regulated, by licensure of him or herself and vehicle and by presumptively being required to have certain liability insurance coverage.
Likewise, only the naive are unaware of the profits which members of the lawyering class crank out of the many types of traffic-related cases brought into traffic courts where the entire proceedings upon scrutiny may sensibly be viewed only as orchestrated opera bouffe performances for the benefit of witless defendants/clients.
We who are not naive have a responsibility to our fellow hueman/human beings and to freedom itself to stand up for our selves and our God given rights as guaranteed us by our state and federal constitutions.
By now I’m in jail or could be dead. If I were free you wouldn’t be reading this; I would have taken it down. I want to inform the public of the various injustices through fraudulent commercial contracts registrations/licenses etc. being perpetrated upon the citizens of Connecticut and all other states of the union. Do you have any knowledge of the “TAKING” CLAUSE in the 5th Amendment? You see the crumbs the government gave them for their properties in the Eminent Domain Case in New London. That’s a Breach of Contract and Breach of The Trust, among other things. Remember Ronald Reagan? Sure you do…
Title 5 of the United States Code, between sections 601 and 627 addresses everything about “TAKING”. There’s numerous explanations about Government taking without just compensation.
Within those sections it says “The 5th Amendment is self implementing”. In other words, all you have to do is bring it up and it’s implemented. It’s not statutory, there’s no statutory necessity behind it.
Those sections were a proclamation written by President Reagan and Congress adopted his proclamation into law VERBATIM. This is why George Bush Sr. didn't want to give up the Ronald Reagan papers. And every bit of it was about government agencies and their actions constituting a “TAKING” without just compensation.
Let me start by informing you that US Citizens have NO RIGHTS! The various government agencies/corporations never inform you of the legal incapacities and disabilities (FRAUD) which are to befall you by registration & recordation. Your private property; be it your home, your car, your body is not required by law to be recorded. (see U.C.C. 1-203 and 1-201 (25, 26, & 27). They have a good faith obligation to explain “Full Disclosure” and serve “WRITTEN NOTICE” in advance.
This is done through fraud, deception and adhesive contracts to confiscate money from the private citizens under the color of law; Which is not law at all..
(Title 18 United States Code §242 Clearly Provides)
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(Title 18 United States Code §245 In addition Provides)
Whoever whether or not acting under color of law, intimidates or interferes with any person from participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; [or] applying for or enjoying employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year or both.
(Title 18 United States Code §1983 Also Provides)
Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
HERE'S SOME CASE LAW
"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but a common and fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 NE 22, 66 ALR 834. Ligare v. Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 28 NE 934. Boone v. Clark, 214 SW 607; 25 AM JUR (1st) Highways, Sec.163.
"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by a carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a City may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579.
"The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125.
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436, 491.
The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. U.S. 230 F 2d 486, 489.
"Our system of government, based upon the individuality and intelligence of the citizen, the state does not claim to control him, except as his conduct to others, leaving him the sole judge as to all that only affects himself." Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S. 623, 659-6O.
In my particular case; a East Hartford, policeman with nothing better to do followed me to my private cleaning account. I ran no light, wasn’t speeding or anything. He asked me was my car registered. I responded with “give me your name, bond number, the name, number and address of the bonding company, the name number and address of the risk management company handling the bond and tell you anything you want to know.
I have the right to know who I’m doing business with. He had no right under law to force me into contracting with him. RCW 62A.1-207 clearly states: I cannot be forced into a contract by anyone against my own free will. Especially Government and especially not without the information I required from him. That’s all a traffic citation or ticket is, an offer of a contract. He swore an oath to protect me from the very thing he’s doing to me. It’s all in conjunction with the New World Order (NWO).
Hear it from a Retired Police Officer Jack McLamb who’s Oath of Office was more important than unlawfully collecting revenue for the lawyers/Judges/ Politicians.
These violations are Originating in the American Republic Venue under Aboriginal Treaty Law and the Organic Constitution Jurisdiction.
The 1778 Treaty between The Delawares American Native Sovereign Nation and the United States of America Nation.
Here’s Additional Authorities Supporting My Civil and Criminal Claims:
Article VI the Organic Constitution aboriginal Jurisdiction of the District is conferred given to Constitutional Law.
Title 28 United States Code Annotated §-1361 aboriginal jurisdiction of the District is given to Constitutional Law Sustaining the Supremacy of Treaties in Law in the Courts throughout the United States America.
Title 28 United States Code the Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Part V, Procedure Chapter III, General Provisions at the §-1652 the sub-title being, State Laws as Rules of Decision; is publishing the statutory Judicial claim that the rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States are regarded as decisions except where the Constitution or Treaties otherwise require or provide. The Constitution and Treaties demand the execution of a Civil and a Criminal Claim WHEREAS the decisions from the Connecticut Superior Court are void without merit force or standing in Law conflicting with the Organic Treaty Law and the Organic Constitutional Law that is demanding Justice in Truth.
Title 28 United States Code – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Part V – Procedure §-2072 which is publishing the fact that any rule order decision abridging enlarging or modifying any substantive right shall be of no further force or effect after such rules orders decision have taken effect. Again the Decisions of the Connecticut Superior Court is void on its face having neither force nor authority void without merit force or standing in Law conflicting with the Organic Treaty Law and the Organic Constitutional Law that is demanding Justice in Truth.
This will be my Claim To Prosecute for Breach of Fiduciary of Duty.
The following legal definitions from Black’s Law Dictionary provide the foundation from which my lawful claim including Misconduct and Disciplinary Claims process is to be built providing sufficient Forensic Evidence validation confirming affirming the listing of all the possible claims following the definitions to insure a full remedy.
Black’s Law Dictionary provides profound definitions of the actions of the above parties cited in this Claim by the following terms and these actions will be demonstrated as Forensic Evidence in my Intended claims presented by the various Civic Organizations & Ministries I belong to.
Belligerency – the status of de facto statehood attributed to a body of insurgents, by which their hostilities are legalized. The international status assumed by a state (i.e. nation) which wages war against another. Page 155
Belligerent – One who is hostile or combative which as a state is hostile, combative and wages war hostilities and aggression against its own citizens by a body of insurgents by which their war hostilities are presumed legalized. Page 155.
Privateer – A vessel owned, equipped, and armed by one or more individuals, and duly commissioned by a belligerent power to make war upon the enemy, usually by preying on his commerce. A vessel is commissioned by a state or a nation by the issue of a letter of marque to its owner to carry on all hostilities, presumably according to the laws of war. Formerly a state issued letters of marque to its own subjects, and to those of neutral states as well, but a privateersman who accepted letters of marque from both belligerents was regarded as a pirate. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA §-1692 et seq. See Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition page 1195
Letter of Marque – An authorization formerly granted in time of war by a government to the owner of a vessel to capture enemy vessels and goods. See Article I §-8 US Constitution. Ibid page 904
War – For there to be a war a sovereign or a quasi-sovereign must engage in hostilities. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., C.A.N.Y., 505 F.2d 989,1005. Ibid page 1583.
Piracy – Those acts of robbery and depredation upon the high seas, which if committed on land, would have amounted to a felony. Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life. 18 USCA §-1651. Piracy and Privateering are Federal offences 18 USCA §-1692 et seq
The above definitions of terms under Piracy apply to the hostile activities at navigable waters under Maritime Law as cited at 18 USCA §-1651. However, under Privateering these same war hostile combative actions are carried at dry dock on the land within Commercial Law. The Defendant in this Counter Claim is demonstrating and exhibiting the actions and the behaviors in perfect conformity to the law definitions above. The actions of Privateering Terrorist and Racketeering actions are applicable to the defendant and its Insurgent agents as evidenced below:
The Claims will produce forensic evidence showing how the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION issues LETTERS OF MARQUE via Colorable de facto Laws, Statutes, Public Policies, Codes, Rules Administrative Procedures etc to Agencies and the Agents (those listed above) in turn function as the Insurgents committing hostile and warlike acts of blatantly, directly, forcible, employing intimidation, fear, threats, actions such as coercion, terrorism, racketeering, privateering under the Color of Law and Color of Right conspiring against, abridging and depriving the Defendants and access to the Rights and Constitutional Exemptions of the Defendants ands that are Secured and Protected by Law from such actions.
Possible charges under consideration in the Intention of Initiating My Criminal and or Civil claims.
Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering Assault and battery against Substantive Secured Rights.
Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, §-241 Conspiracy against private property rights.
Title 28- Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil Rights, §-242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.
The 4th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of security of the Private Property Right from government invasion.
The 5th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of Liberty and Private Property without Just Compensation.
The Theft of the Personal Private Property by Taking without Just Compensation.
The Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering actions against the 1778 Treaty Between the United States Government and the Sovereign Delawares Indigenous Native Sovereign Nation and Steve-Elliott: Sailor and the Consul Minister The Noble Steve Sailor descendants of the Treaty Rights and Constitutional Protection.
The Treason Treacherous Terrorism Racketeering Privateering actions against Steve-Elliott: Sailor a living National Descendant Soul by Birthright and Inheritance of the Treaty Rights and Constitutional Protection.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter I §-1985–Conspiracy interfering with Private Property Rights.
The United States Code Annotated Title 18 §-1651 et seq Piracy and Privateering activities conducted on vessels at dry dock under commercial law by a body of insurgent Privateers.
The United States Code Title 42 §-1983 For the awarding for private personal body property damage.
The United States Code Title 18 §-152 and §-3571 provides fine up to $500,000.00 or imprisonment for up to 5 years for the presenting of fraudulent claims fraudulent indictment fraudulent evidence.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter II obstructing the evidence in the witnesses through the modification of language creating Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations activities extorting financial means creating economical damage point beyond recovery.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter III deprivation of the evidence in the witnesses through modification of language creating acts of Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Terrorism Privateering.
The United States Code Title 42 §-1986 For knowledge and the right to stop and correct a wrong,
The United States Code Title 28 USC §-1746 and Title 18 §-1621 Perjury and conspiring to commit perjury.
The United States Code Title 18 §-1001 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b). Extorting private property through the modification of language.
The United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 95 §-1651 Interference with commerce by threats or violence.
Acting without establishing as a matter of record Proper Jurisdiction.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Upholding the “Oath of Office” and Upholding the Office of Public Trust.
Acts of War against the United States Government Treaties and Organic Constitution Constituting Treason.
Violation of Substantive Rights and Private Property Rights Secured and Protection by Constitutional Law.
Employing Intimidation to affect Identity Nationality Birthright Thief Using a Fiction Artificial Person Name to Impersonate and Steal the Sovereign De Jure Identity.
No one was born into US Citizenship. The 13th Amendment Clearly Provides… ”Involuntary Servitude Shall Not Exist Within the United States”.
In order to become a United States Citizen you MUST VOLUNTEER! And under the law They have a good faith obligation to explain “Full Disclosure” and serve “WRITTEN NOTICE” in advance. Did they do that? NO! therefore they have no jurisdiction because I never volunteered. This is what they must prove; But they can’t without my consent. And speaking of US Citizenship BAR (British Accredited Registry) Attorneys aren’t even US Citizens. Page 220 of the Immigration and Nationality Act; Chapter 3-Loss of Nationality Specifically Word for Word States; Sec. 349. [8 U.S.C. 1481] (a) (1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application or upon an application filed by a duly authorized agent, after having attained the age of eighteen years; or (2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision. In fact; they're not even licensed to practice law. That BAR Card is nothing more than a Union Dues Card. It's nothing more than the equivalent of a BJ's Wholesale Membership. I’m aware of all the tricks and intimidation tactics they will use to try to get it. If anything they’ll lock me up for knowing to much, at which time I'll have a solid, concrete claim. If everyone in the community knew what I know about this the lawyers/judges wouldn’t be able to exercise jurisdiction over anyone.
For example; they make you get Auto Insurance, Insurance is nothing more than extortion & racketeering. It violates various (RICO) Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations laws. The underlying law is Financial Responsibility. If you want to save Hundreds or maybe even Thousands, depending on how many cars you have…
Be sure to get on the Community Financial Bond Call Above. Always say you were referred By Steve-Elliott: Sailor.
All you need to know are within these pages. All you got from school was an ed-fool-cation, designed by the UN to keep you in ignorance and under their control until they complete their agenda. Right now George Bush is planning on an attack on the american people to sell them on a war with Iran & Syria. It's gonna be a hard sell and he knows it; that's why he's going after 200,000 lives. I guess he figures if he got you into enough panic he can persuade you into an unjust war. Look; the blood of our brothers & sisters over in Iraq and anywhere else they’re stationed is on our hands, due to our ignorance. The Number 1 killer in our Country is not a disease and even most of the ones they say are so deadly are frauds.
It's all under the same agenda. The Number 1 Killer in our Country is not a disease at all, it's IGNORANCE! People are riding around with ribbons saying “Support our Troops”. They have no clue as to what they’re saying. It just gives confirmation to the lawyer/judges/politicians as to just how stupid we really are. I’m sorry but it’s time you learned the truth. Well that's it for me, look; don’t take my word for it, do yourself a favor and look it up for yourself. Stop believing that garbage they're selling you on CNN; it's under the policy of the Counsel of Foreign Relations, they control ALL MEDIA.
Take this information to your local Civil Liberties Union, see what they do. Then we'll truly know if they're for the people or if they were established by the traitors who swore allegiance to the British Crown to deceive and enslaved us like The Counsel on Foreign Relations,
The UN and Federal Reserve System; Click2Hear How it Was truly Created. www.reformed-theology.org/realaudio/griffin_1.rm
If we don't begin the process of taking America back NOW! we'll never get it back. They're too far ahead of us as it is...and remember
HE WHO DOES NOT ASSERT HIS RIGHTS HAS NONE.
NONE ARE MORE HOPELESSLY ENSLAVED THAN THOSE WHO FALSELY BELEIVE THEY ARE FREE...
This is from Dr. Rev. Joseph-Michael: Gardinier®. What I am about to share with you may or may not be of interest to you, but if you take a few minutes out of your precious time you will certainly read something that will trigger the real American hidden within your core being.
It all started back some three hundred years ago, but for now we will only concern ourselves with the past two hundred years. That should give me enough history to bring you up to speed.
Let’s start back in the late 1700s when America was at war with England, did we win? Or did we just negotiate our way out of it? Our history books in school will tell you we won that war, but a true historian will tell you that we came to an agreement and negotiated our way out of it; so why would our schools teach us otherwise?
The Queen of England still Rules America on paper. Yes that’s right, she rules through Lawyers and Attorneys, hence the BAR ASSOCIATION (British Accredited Registry). All Lawyers and Attorneys are sworn into a club called (the BAR association) which is nothing more then a bunch of aristocrats modeled after the Queens own jesters and her courts and we the people have to get a Lawyer or an Attorney to re-present us in a Court of Lies I mean Law. Funny how that works, huh?
Now we move forward to 1861. President Lincoln has a problem: seven southern states have walked out leaving him with no quorum, so what does he do? He declares martial law, orders the reconvening of congress, and moves forward at gunpoint in so many words. So that means that America has been under martial law since 1861 and still is today. We simply were never told this little detail of history in school; I wasn’t, were you? Also during these trying times we did something quite stupid and allowed Central Banking into our midst again, hence the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank. Wow, we Americans must be really stupid or something because this type of Banking has been tried twice before and each time it failed but here we are again; they say that History will repeat itself what do you say?
Are you still with me? Your really should read the book called “The Creature from Jekyll Island”, by G. Edward Griffin, a wonderful true story about our past and the creation of a cartel called the FRB (Federal Reserve Bank) a privately owned off-shore Bank that has the whole world in it’s control.
In 1913 we borrowed lots of money from the Central Bank FRB in order to continue to run our government. It was a 20-year note to be paid in gold or gold certificates. After 20 years were up, we still did not have enough gold and in 1933 President F. D. Roosevelt declared a state of emergency and confiscated everyone’s gold! Do you remember that? I don’t cause I was not even born yet.
Now we have no gold and we have no money, so what does a business do when it runs out of money? It goes Bankrupt. That’s right the USA is Bankrupt and has been for hundreds of years, so now what do we do to stay open in business?
Yes, you heard me. In order to stay in business, the USA or UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed chapter 11 and has been running out of bankruptcy since 1933.
WASHINGTON DC/DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA was incorporated back in 1786 just like a normal business and our so-called government has been running just like a business ever since. So it’s not Cesar it’s a business, and you do not have to contract with any one you don’t wish to especially GOVERNMENT. RCW 62A.1-207 clearly states: I cannot be forced into a contract by anyone against my own free will.
Sorry I tend to skip around a lot but I hope you are getting an ear full.
Stay with me as I try to put this into perspective for you. A lot was happening between 1926 and 1939 and the Rich Bankers were having a field day. Why? Because it was pay day or pay dirt. They had managed to get all the Gold from the people in 1933 and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the money they loaned and accumulated over the past 20 years and now they had us between a rock and a hard place.
How were they to stay in business? What did they have of value that they, I mean what could the GOVERNMENT, on behalf of the people put up for collateral to keep on keeping on as they say. YOU! Yes that’s right you and I, the citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was the collateral behind the money now and the IRS created in 1939 was the collection agency of the privately owned off shore International Trust known as the Federal Reserve Bank.
Yes folks the IRS Internal Re-venue Service in not the GOVERNMENT but rather a contractor hired to collect a usury tax called (Income Tax) and even that is not and cannot be construed as wages, wages is and always will be a form of trade for services rendered not income which is derived from interest earned or stated.
Does your head hurt yet?
Under HJR 192 (House Joint Resolution) of June 5th 1933 it came to pass that no one could be forced to use or give any form of tender to anyone for payment of anything.
Yes you heard me, a Law was passed making it against the Law for anyone to be forced to tender any form of payment in a specified substance, be it gold or silver or American dollar/US minted paper money, because the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT was Bankrupt and there no longer was anything of value to back the paper notes, but you and I, so what does this all mean to us the so called people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
Are you telling me I don’t have to pay for anything any more, I can just take it! No, what I am telling you is that you can’t pay for anything you can only discharge it. That means set it aside to be paid at a later date. But how will it be paid if I can’t pay for it and who really owns it?
The STATE does! All ownership is in virtue of STATE so says the LAW. The GOVERNMENT BORROWED the FRB notes and they owe the FRN’s/money back to the FRBanksters. At the same time they loaned it out to you and called it public debt and made you and I responsible for the bill. Now that’s the ultimate scam in the history of mankind! The Federal Reserve Bank has a contract with our GOVERNMENT to print our U.S. dollars and it only costs them $30.00 to print 100,000 notes in any denomination so 10 million for 30 bucks not bad for a days work.
Are you mad yet?
Not bad huh? Go bankrupt and then to stay in business pledge your own citizens without their knowledge to have to pay the debt back. That’s not cool. When I learned all this I was PISSED OFF and had to know more about what was going on behind door #2.
So for the passed five years now I have been reading all kinds of books and studying on the internet for thousands of hours, man my head hurts! But like they say: No pain no gain. Your brain is just like a muscle; the more you exercise it the stronger it will become and smarter.
II - GOVERNMENT FALSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION WITHIN THE PUBLIC RECORD
Knowledge is power, why do you think the rich get richer? It’s because they use their brains more then their muscles, we are just the poor working class and have no rights just privileges in their world of plenty.
Let me give you some statistics: 6,300 homes are foreclosed on each day in America the land of the FREE. We have about a 280 million population in America today, fifty million of which are naturalized and it keeps growing at an enormous rate so why are there so many starving and homeless in this great land of the free?
We can’t even take care of our own let alone send FRNs/money to others countries to feed their people. This activity only increases our national deficit. That’s right, every time big brother spends these FRNs, you and I owe more back. There are about 12,000 cars repossessed each and every day in the land of the FREE, so why do they keep giving out these FRNs like they’re candy or something? Our deficit is at an all time high of 14 Trillion and growing, I think it is time that you order your STATES BUGET REPORT and see where all your money is going.
Don’t you think the Banks should have to tell the consumer that they can’t afford the new car and the house? But no, they keep on giving them out and they keep on taking them back and selling them to someone else. The game just keeps rolling right along like nothing is wrong, but there is something wrong!
The financial game that is being played today is on a crash course and our congressman knows it. They made (We the People) owe the debt. Someone is going to foreclose on our lands and us here in America and it’s not going to be pretty!
A. UCC-1, is in my opinion one of the most powerful documents you will ever file.
Read on to learn WHY! Revised By: Dr. Rev. Joseph-Michael: Gardinier ®
Today the majority of Americans pay taxes because when they get a job their employer requests that they fill out either: Internal Revenue Service Form W-2, Form W-4, or Form 1099 which, as a direct result, withholds taxes from their paychecks for their labor. [The majority doesn’t have a clue as to why they are paying these taxes in the first place] They think their so-called money is being used to pay for roads, schools and other projects of the Government, but this is not true.
It has been affirmed that labor is a fundamental, unalienable right, protected by the United States Constitution. This fundamental right is not supposed to be taxed, you are in trade with your employer you have not made a profit.
It is presumed that every one is expected to know the law. It has been long held that, ignorance of the Law is not an excuse or a defense. The well established maxim that: “He who fails to assert his rights-HAS NONE!” unequivocally establishes that just as a closed mouth never gets fed, “a matter must be expressed to be resolved.” You must answer or by your silence you agree to the charges.
The Bible, Book Of Luke, 11th Chapter 52nd verse states: “ Woe unto you, lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering ye hindered.” Our Father also referenced the money charges in the Bible, but that is for you to find.
When it comes to dealing with lawyers, government, and the internal revenue service [which is not an agency of the United States Government, but a private foreign-owned corporation] withholding and keeping knowledge from the people is nothing new. It is a common business tactic that has been going on from the beginning of its inception. It will, most likely continue as long as we rely upon lawyers and government to do that which we ourselves should be doing. We have allowed our government to get this way by our ignorance, our complacent and pure laziness.
The Bible unquestionably verifies this with the following Book Of Isaiah, 5th Chapter 13th verse tells us: “therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge:” Get up off the couch and Read a Book about something, try “ Rich Dad Poor Dad” but get away from the T.V. and the news media “Mind Control”
In order to find the answer as to why your labor is being taxed, when the Constitution says it is not supposed to be, it is necessary to understand how government exists and operates. And remember, these are your employee’s, stop acting in fear!
F.E.A.R = False Evidence Appearing Real
To accomplish this requires a quick review back in history to the time of the War Between the States. The People of this Nation lost their true Republican form of government. On March 27, 1861 seven southern States walked out of Congress leaving the entire legislative Branch of Government without quorum. The Congress of the Constitution was dissolved for inability to disband or re-convene. The Republican form of Government, which the People were guaranteed- ceased to exist. Out of necessity to operate the Government, President Lincoln issued Executive Order No. 2 in April 1861, reconvening the Congress at gunpoint in Executive, emergency, martial-law-rule jurisdiction. Since that time there ha been no “de jure’ (sanctioned by law) Congress. Everything functions under “color of law” (the appearance or semblance, without substance, of legal right.) Through Executive Orders under authority of the Was Powers, (i.e. emergency, i.e. law of necessity) the “law of necessity “ means no law whatsoever, as per such maxims of law as:
“Necessity knows no law’ [(the law of forbidding killing is voided when done in self defense)]
“ In time of war laws are silent” Cicero
Within 3 ½ years or so Lincoln was assassinated because he vowed to re-establish a Republican form of Government and go back to the Constitution.
To establish the underlying debt of the Government to the Bankers, to create corporate entities that are legally subject to the jurisdiction which they exist, and to create the jurisdiction itself correctly, the so called (fraudulent and ungratified) Fourteenth Amendment was proclaimed and passed in 1868. This was a cestui que trust (operation in law) incorporated in a military, private, International, commercial, de facto jurisdiction created by, and belonging to, the Money Power, existing within the emergency of the War Powers, the only operational jurisdiction since the dissolution of Congress in 1861. Through the 14th Amendment, an artificial person-corporate entity-franchise entitled “ citizen of the United States” was born into private, corporate limited liability. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment states: “ The validity of the Public Debt of the United States (to the Bankers) shall not be questioned.”
Within the above-referenced private jurisdiction of the International Bankers, the private and foreign owned “Congress” formed a corporation, commercial agency, and Government for the “District of Columbia” on February 21, 1871, Chapter 62, 16 Stat. 419. This corporation was reorganized June 11, 1878, Chapter 180, 20 Stat. 102, and re-named “ United States Government.” This corporation privately trade marked the names: “ United States,” “U.S.,” “US,” “ U.S.A.”, “ USA” and “America.“
When the United States declared itself a municipal corporation, it also created what is known as a cestui que trust to function under by implementing the Federal Constitution of 1871, and incorporating the previous United States Constitutions of 1787 and 1791 as amended, as by-laws. Naturally, as the grantor of the trust, this empowered the United States Government to change the terms of the trust at will. As evidenced under the Federal Constitution of 1871, the 14th Amendment, the People of the United States, without their consent, were declared “ Citizens” and granted “ Civil Rights.” These so-called civil rights are nothing more than mere privileges. Privileges which government licenses, regulates, and can re-interpret to suit it’s purpose at any time for any reason. The Federal Corporate Government also conveniently somehow forgot to disclose to the People that the term “ Citizen” with which they have made every living and breathing inhabitant a ‘subject”, was defined in law as a “Vessel” engaged in commerce.
In 1912, when the bonds, that were keeping the US Government afloat, and, were owned by the Bankers, came due, the Bankers refused to re-finance the debt, and the colorable, martial-law-rule Congress was compelled to pass, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This Act surrendered constitutional authority to created, control, and manage the entire money supply of the United States to a handful of private, mostly-foreign bankers. This placed exclusive creation and control of the money within the private, commercial, foreign, and military jurisdiction of 1861, into corporate limited liability. Read the book: “The Creature from Jekyll Island” By: Edward Griffin
America converted from United States Notes to Federal Reserve Notes, beginning with the passage of The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Federal Reserve Banks were incorporated in 1914, and, in 1916, began to circulate their private, corporate Federal Reserve Notes as “money” alongside the nations “de jure” currency, the United States Notes. Whereas United States Notes were actually warehouse receipts for deposit of gold and silver in a warehouse (bank), thus representing wealth (substance, portable land: the money of sovereigns), the new flat money (Federal Reserve Notes) amounted to “ bills for that which was yet to be paid, “ i.e. for what was owed! For the new “benefit” of being able to carry around U.S. Government debt instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) in our wallets instead of Gold Certificates or Silver Certificates, we agreed to redeem the newly issued Federal Reserve Notes in gold and also to pay interest for their use in gold ONLY! Essentially, the Fed issued paper with pretty green ink on it and we agreed to give them gold in exchange for the “privilege” of using it. Such was the bargain. Doesn’t this sound like the Great Kahn to you, King of China, read history people.
On March 9, 1933, Congress passed the Amendatory Act (also known as the Emergency Banking Relief Act) to the Trading with the Enemy Act (originally passed on October 6, 1917) at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe and included the People of the United States as the enemy.
At the conference of Governors held on March 6, 1933, the Governors of the 48 States of the Union accommodated the Federal Bankruptcy of the United States Corporation by,
Pledging the faith and credit of their State to the aid of the National Government.
Senate Document 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1933) did declare that ownership of ALL PROPERTY is in the STATE and individual so-called ownership is only by virture of government, i.e. law amounting to “mere-user” only: and individual use of all property is subordinate to the necessities of the United States Government.
Under House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5 1933, Senate Report No. 93549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6012 and 6246, the Congress and President Roosevelt officially declared bankruptcy of the United States Government.
Regardless of the cause or reason, what many American’s either do not understand and/or have failed to seriously grasp, is that by the use of Federal Reserve Notes; (which is not Constitutional Money defined under Article 1 Section 10 of the United States Constitution), the People of the United States since 1933, have not had any Constitutionally lawful way to pay their debts. They therefore have not had any way to buy or own property. The People, for the benefits granted to them by a bankrupt corporate Government, discharge their debts with limited liability using Federal Reserve Notes. They have surrendered, by way of an unconscionable contract, their individual Rights under the Constitution, in exchange for mere privileges! If you pay land tax or get tabs for your car or have a license to drive, you are a contractual slave and own nothing.
A review of countless United States Supreme Court decisions since the 1938, landmark case, Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, (304 U.S. 64-92) clearly establishes that only the State has Constitutional Rights, not the People. The People have been pledged to the bankruptcy of 1933. The federal law administered in and by the United States is the private commercial “law” of the CREDITORS. That, due to the bankruptcy,
Every” citizen of the United States’ is pledged as an asset to support the bankruptcy, must work to pay the insurance premiums on the underwriting necessary to keep the bankrupt government in operation under Chapter 11 Bankruptcy (Reorganization). That upon the declared Bankruptcy, Americans could operate and function only through their corporate colored, State created, ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME, - that has no access to sovereignty, substance, rights, and standing in law. The Supreme Court also held the “general (Universal) common law” no longer accessible and in operation in the federal courts based on the 1933, bankruptcy, which placed everything into the realm of private, colorable law merchant of the Federal Reserve CREDITORS. To take this to a different level and not only explain why you pay taxes, but also why you do not own the house you live in, the car you drive, or own anything else you thing you’ve bought and paid for etc. The State Government and its CREDITORS own it all. If you think you own your home just because you believed you paid for it using those Federal Reserve Notes, just like everything else you possess by permission of Government, simply stop paying your taxes, (user-fees), (licenses) and see just how long Government and the CREDITORS allow you to keep it before they come to take it away from you.
How can all this really be? Why haven’t you been told all of this before now? Ignorance of the law is no excuse! Every man is deemed (required) to know the law. Government expects you to know the law, and holds you fully accountable for doing so. Ignoring these facts will not protect you. The majority of American’s have been given a Public Education to teach the, only what the Public, i.e. government (CREDITORS) wants them to know. It is and always has been each individual personal responsibility, duty and obligation to learn and know the law.
What this breaks down to is this: Back in 1933, when the United States went into bankruptcy because it could no longer pay its debts it pledged the American People themselves without their consent as the asset to keep the government afloat and operating, along with all the land, cars, boats, planes, buildings and minerals in the ground. Because government no longer had any way to pay its debts with substance, was bankrupt, it lost its sovereignty and standing law. Outside and separate from Constitutional Government, to continue to function and operate, it created an artificial world consisting of artificial entities. This was accomplished by taking everyone’s proper birth given name and creating what is called a “fiction in law” by way of an acronym, i.e. a name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS to interact with. A name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS is not a sentient, flesh and blood human being. It is a corporation, fiction or deceased person. Government as well as all corporations, including the Revenue Service cannot deal interact with you or interact with you via your proper name given you at birth, only through your ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME! Take a look in your wallet, what’s on your I.D. card/contracts.
Another little tidbit of knowledge which has been conveniently kept from the People is this: When the Several united States signed the treaty with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War, it was a concession that ALL COMMERCE would be regulated and contracted through British Attorney’s known as Esquires only.
This condition and concession still exists today. No attorney or lawyer in the United States of America has ever been “licensed” to practice law (they’ve exempted themselves) as they are a legal fiction “person” and only an “ADMITTED MEMBER” to practice in the private franchise club called the BAR (which is itself an acronym for the British or Barrister Aristocratic or Accreditation Regency), as such are un-registered foreign agents, and so they are traitors. Esquires (Unconstitutional Title of honor and nobility = Esquires), foreign non-citizens (aliens) who are specifically prohibited from ever holding any elected Public Office of trust whatsoever! Article 1 Section 9, clause 8, states: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
As a direct result, attorneys and lawyers cannot and do not represent you in your proper birth or given name. Attorneys and lawyers re-present corporations, artificial persons, and fictions in law – ONLY! We look forward to the day that each and every true American present his or her selves own issues in a court of Law pro sae.
What the majority in this country fail to recognize is this: because of the bankruptcy and have been pledged as an asset to the National Government’s debt, this makes all citizens DEBTORS under Chapter 11. DEBTORS in bankruptcy having lost their solvency-have NO RIGHTS nor STANDING IN LAW and are at the mercy of the CREDITORS/ Predators to which the Debtor is its prey.
All courts today sit and operate as Non-Constitutional, Non- Article Three Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy via their “statues,” (“codes,”). All Courts are Title 11 Bankruptcy Courts where these statues are, in reality, “commercial obligations” being applied for the “benefit” of “privilege” of discharging debts with limited liability of the Federal Reserve monopoly, colorable-money Federal Reserve Notes (debt instruments).
This means every time you end up before a court- not only do you NOT have any standing in law to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, YOU HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Why? Because you are a DEBTOR under the bankruptcy and in addition to having contracted away your rights in exchange for benefits and privileges; you do not have one single shred of evidence to establish otherwise.
In bankruptcy ONLY CREDITORS have rights! In a nutshell, as a DEBTOR, it is impossible for you to access Constitutional Rights, they are reduced to mere privileges which are licensed, regulated, and can be altered, amended and changed to meet whatever the particular or special needs of government for whatever whim. If taking away your home, your car, taxing your labor, or locking you up for violation any of the Sixty MILLION plus legislatively created DEBTOR codes and statutes they have on the books today happens to meet the needs of government – it really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize who the loser will be! It is far past time for us to get up off our assets and change the way they perceive us in Mind over matter. Start Minding your own business and affairs and stop relying on a liar to do it for you.
B. IS THERE REALLY A REMEDY?
Is there really a real remedy to what has been done? Quite simply, Yes! There is many ways and one of them can protect you/your family, and property from this public obligation. The only unbreakable contract is existence in the world today is a UCC-1 Financing Statement. (Uniform Commercial Code)
Only through filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement and Accepting For Honor and taking for value as true your Birth Certificate and executing a lien upon the governmentally created ALL-CAPTIAL-LETTERS NAME by you in your proper Birth given Name as the Secured Party, and listing anything and everything you own, will own, or possibly ever could own, as collateral in the Security Agreement, can you effectively place a Superior Lien against the DEBTOR then making you the CREDITOR, putting you in the position of truly owning property and having access to enforceable Constitutional Rights. By filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement, you become the CREDITOR with standing in law and acquire the ability to stake a claim upon which relief can be granted, and not have the fruits of your labor taxed or taken.
Simply follow up the UCC-1 Financing Statement with a Public Notice, Trade name/Trademark filing backed with a Declaration of Treaty of Peace to the World and a few other choice filings and Notifications to the powers that think they be, you will then as a Creditor operate on the private side of Commercial Law in commerce and have all the benefits of being the Predator for a change.
Without a UCC-1 Financing Statement, everything you have is pledged and owned by the STATE. You merely are the user of the property and must use that property in strict compliance with all the rules and regulations established by the STATE. If acquiring your Saveronty (this is an American word) and having the ability to own property free from out side influence or controls, and the ability to earn a living without taxation-interests you then you have nothing to loss and everything to gain by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with no delay.
To try and break this down ever further, few people truly understand the word “slave and slavery.” The biggest benefit in filing a UCC-1 is that you will no longer be a slave. The fact is most dictionaries fail to provide an accurate definition of the words “slave and slavery.” Even Webster’s 1828 edition of the English language dictionary fails in its attempt to define the true meaning of the word “slavery”; “Slave: a person who is wholly subject to the will of another.” Slavery is not a matter of being totally 100% subject to the will of another. Any person or people, who is to any degree involuntarily subject to the will of another, are still a slave. There are no degrees of slavery. The second part of the 2nd definition of slave provides by Webster’s 1828 Edition is: “One who surrenders himself to any power whatsoever,” Which is closer to the real point. Why do we surrender to Cesar what is due Cesar when it is not Cesar on the thrown any more but a mere Corporation privately owned and controlled.
The Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] governs ALL commercial transactions in the United States and now throughout International trade. Any “person” including government corporations, agencies, etc. involved in the “sale of goods, commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk transfer, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and secured transactions” is governed by the UCC. The A form Uniform Commercial Code is adopted by all States.
To comply with the Uniform Commercial Code in your state, if they are accepting, if not Washington State will do, a UCC-1 Financing Statement must be filed with the Secretary of State, by any “person” who makes a claim against any other “person” in the area of commerce. All government agencies, (city, county, state and federal), operate in commerce and all of them, including the Internal Revenue Service, are private corporations. All Courts operate in commerce. All Banks operate in commerce. All “Corporations operate in commerce and all of these “entities” exist financially because WE are their collateral. They borrow on our “credit.” You must understand that you are the lender and they are the borrowers, they do a bait and switch and by contract make you the borrower and them the lender, when all along it was your signature that created the so called money to be withdrawal from your account and refunded back to you at full face value plus interest for the next thirty plus years.
At one time, our currency was backed by or given substance by gold or silver. It has been thought by many, since the United States took the substance of gold and silver away, that Federal Reserve Notes were simply worthless paper, backed by nothing at all. That is not correct! Today, real people, United States Citizen’s, you, me, your children, etc. back Federal Reserve Notes, much the same way that GOLD AND SILVER DID IN THE PAST. In other words, the living, breathing people guarantee or provide the substance for ALL money that is created. The Federal Reserve Bank clearly states: “ Federal Reserve Notes are backed by the Full Faith and credit of the American People.” Blind Faith sets forth that YOU trust THEM. Who? None other than the Federal Reserve! Credit means something is due you! The Federal Reserve uses our credit to create ALL money. All the money created belongs to the American People and the deceit of the Public and private corporations is so complete, they create it, charge it to us as a debt and then tack interest to it on top of that!
How did the American People become collateral for the debt instruments known as Federal Reserve Notes? A corporation called the United States, the very same corporation that created the Federal Reserve, gave it to the Federal Reserve. As discussed previously, in 1933 when President Roosevelt declared a national emergency because the United States could no longer pay it debts. At least that was the spill given to the American People. All of the subsidiary States agreed to support the declared bankruptcy by “pledging” the energy of their “citizens”. Look for a book in Government called “Energy” it’s you. Their assets consisted only of State Citizens. The States in turn used the Birth Certificates to pledge to the State Citizen as collateral to keep Government afloat. That is how the American People became collateral for the Federal Reserve Notes and so called debts. The American People became warehouse receipts, like a warehouse full of any type valuable goods. All of this, however, was a major fraud. Neither the Internal Revenue Service nor any other entity like Government files a UCC-1 Financing Statement into Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State. If they did, they would instantly become subject to all the regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code. The Internal Revenue Service has done very nicely by bluffing and intimidation, as all others mentioned, by operating under “Public Policy” where there is in reality “No Law’ at all! The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) never files a Lien, they only file a Notice of a Lien to which is not a true Lien in Law, but a scare tactic that you and the Bank files for.
The State Citizen is drawn “into commerce” when their Birth Certificate is registered and sent to the Commerce Department in Washington D.C. This is where the American People became warehouse receipts upon which all money is printed and circulated is created and guaranteed. In short, the American People became the collateral for all debts. They “The People” allegedly are “Government” property! And we will shoe you how valuable you really are as a co-op partner to all of America you are worth Billions and don’t even know it.
Government is a “fiction” and an artificial person and deals with us as a fiction or persons only as stated before. To take this still to another level, let’s use an example to explain and use the name John Doe Smith. When John Doe Smith was born, his parents gave him the Christian name of John Doe and he shared the name of Smith with all the other members of his family. He was born a living breathing being. When his Birth Certificate was sent to the Department of Commerce, or taken before you can leave the hospital, it was registered 5 days later, and the Government, because it was bankrupt, turned his “real name” into a fiction. His new fictional name became, JOHN DOE SMITH or JOHN D. SMITH. His ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS NAME was registered as a corporation at the Puerto Rico Department of State Corporations (Department de Estado-Division de Corporaciones) P.O. Box 3271, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00904-3271, making him liable for taxes. He is now a fiction or artificial person; a non-living, non-breathing “person.” It is a “straw man” (Lat. stramineus homo) or “fiction” which government brings all its so-called charges against and NEVER against the real person. Just like “yours,” his driver’s license now reads: SMITH, JOHN DOE or JOHN D. SMITH. When he signs a 1040 Tax form, he dutifully fills out the form as John D. Smith and then signs his mane “ under penalty of perjury,” thereby admitting he will be responsible for all the taxes of John D. Smith, a fiction in law, corporation. Look at your driver’s license and see whom it is issued to. How can government use a form of our name and turn it into a fiction (corporation) without our permission? They can’t, we sign our name to all of their forms, which is purely voluntary “permission-in-ignorance.” In short, we do it to ourselves unknowingly.
However, for those who wish to control and own this fiction and prohibit government corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service from making so-called charges against it, a remedy is available: to do this by executing a UCC1 Financing Statement! John Doe Smith would simply do what Government and Internal Revenue Service does not do: File your UCC-1 Financing Statement into the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State and claim EVERYTHING related to John D. Smith or any derivative name, corporation fiction; i.e. the Birth Certificate and Social Security Card and Number. The living, breathing, real person then has a superior lien and controls the fictitious entity, including all contracts related to the Birth Certificate and Social Security Number. Thusly, the real John D. Smith secures all rights, interest and title in the fictitious entity. Now, government and the Internal Revenue Service have to deal with John-Doe: Smith but they cannot! because he is no longer subject to government control, and we execute a Trademark giving you the same control as they have.
Every living breathing person has both a Social Security Card and an Employer Identification Number (yes, there are exceptions.) The Internal Revenue Service calls the Social Security Number our Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Never do they mention our Employer Identification Number (EIN) or Exempt ID number. What, “you are not an employer, so you do not have an EIN?” But wait. Yes you do! We are all employers and every one of us has EIN. If you apply for a new Social Security Card (not a new number), on the backside of the card written in Red is your Employer Identification Number. Government workers are all employees. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM! Government employee’s work for us! we are their employer! That is why, when you read the Tax Code to find the definition of “employee,” under Title 26 United States Code, at Section 3401(c), the term “employee” specifically includes officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a State (Federal State), Territory, of any other political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE EMPLOYEES – THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE THE EMPLOYER. Write to the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the Capital of the State where you were born and request a copy of your Birth Certificate. REQUEST THE LONG FORM (Certified Copy). Never mind that you have a copy right now. More likely than not it came from the County in which you were born. The number assigned to your Birth Certificate by the Vital Statistics Office is of primary importance when executing your UCC-1 Financing Statement.
C. RELIEF FROM TAXES AND ALL OTHER COMMERCIAL OBLIGATIONS ARE WITHIN YOUR POWER AND MIND. YOU MUST ACT IN ORDER TO BE FREE.
What can filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement do for you besides everything described thus far? Let’s throw a few more examples onto the table to explain. As previously stated, the only real thing in the United States is the American People. Corporations are fictions – DEAD ENTITIES! Let’s use a fiction called GENERAL MOTORS for our explanation. Since the inception of GENERAL MOTORS which was originally created by another corporate fiction we call government, they have borrowed into existence countless billions of Federal Reserve Notes. Today GENERAL MOTORS proudly calls themselves one of the largest corporations (a fiction) in the world! It is taught that stockholders of GENERAL MOTORS “own” GENERAL MOTORS. The real truth is that the American People own everything produced by GENERAL MOTORS – free and clear. Isn’t it interesting this fiction charges us the American people for what already belongs to us – and then to add more insult to injury – they tack on a little interest to boot! Wouldn’t you like to go pick out your truck or car, right now? That’s coming soon to a Sovran near you.
When Internal Revenue sends a letter of Notice to the fiction JOHN SMITH and says “Our records indicate you owe $15,000.00,” John Doe: Smith, who has filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement now has multiple options as to how he chooses to deal with this matter. John Doe: Smith knows full well he must respond to the presentment he’s just received from Internal Revenue in a timely manner. Depending on the Notice of Presentment he’s received he has either then (10) days or (30) days to respond. If he does not know what his time frame is to respond in is, to be safe, it would be best for him to respond before the ten (10) days expires. John Doe: Smith knows that if he doesn’t respond, after the allotted time. If he fails to respond the Internal Revenue will enter a Default Judgment against him. Because he failed to object to the bill or ask any questions about it, having defaulted, the amount can lawfully be collected from him. John Doe: Smith also knows that you never argue the amount of deficiency in any tax case. If you are not required to file, you should not care whether they say you owe fifteen thousand dollars or one hundred and fifty thousand dollars. If you are not required to file, the amount doesn’t matter. You never argue the amount because that is a fact issue. The reason for this is usually when you receive a Notice of Deficiency, it is for some unworldly amount. The Internal Revenue Service wants you to run in and argue about the amount. The minute you say, “I don’t owe that much,” you have just agreed that you owed something and conceded jurisdiction. One of the proper methods is to immediately write the Internal Revenue Service a letter notifying them their Presentment is dishonored by you and you have reserved all rights under the Uniform Commercial Code at UCC 1-207. This normally should be all that is required. If this doesn’t make the matter disappear then John Doe: Smith can exercise option No. 2 and can “Accept the $15,000.00 as true and take it for Value” and Return it foreclosure of these accountings, the so-called debt is extinguished. Why? How is that possible? Because every “real” American has a corresponding offsetting “credit” for all debt claimed against his Straw man or fiction. He is Exempt from Levy and Taxation.
Real folks all across America are filing UCC-1 Financing Statements and ridding themselves of the debt and fraud of this beast system called by many as government and their created fictions. It has been established, “Lawyers and Attorneys have written well over Sixty Million Codes and Statutes to confound and confuse the American People and enslave them.” None of these Codes of Statutes apply to any living, breathing, people who claim their heritage through what God has preserved. The fact that many Americans are filing UCC-1 Financing Statements and commercially liberating themselves has caused major alarms to go off with Government and the CREDITORS. In an attempt to slow down our remedy they have gone to a non-signature National form making it easier for them the creditors to file alien without the debtors knowledge, but what they failed to realize is that we can do the same.
After filing your UCC-1 Financing Statement, it can be used by real person to obtain what is known as a “Security Interest” in the fiction (aka Straw man) whom the Internal Revenue Service uses to force, intimidate, threaten and compel the real and blood person to pay what are called taxes. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a Financing Statement is used under Article IX to reflect a Public Record that there is a Security Interest or claim to the goods in question to secure a debt. The Financing Statement is filed by the Security Holder (real person) with the Secretary of State, or similar public body, and as a result becomes Public Record. As a party with a Superior Lien of the fiction or (Straw man), you become the Secured Party with ALL RIGHTS, INTEREST, AND TITLE in the fiction’s Birth Certificate, Social Security Number, Driver’s License, Automobile, Certificate of Title, Credit Cards, Loans, Property, Taxes, etc., etc.! The Straw man owns it; you control it through contract and agreement in the private.
So what did it cost the moneychangers to enslave the American People? Nothing! The same is true for freedom; “For thus says the Lord, Ye have sold yourselves for naught (nothing), and ye shall be redeemed without money.” Isaiah 52nd Chapter, 4th verse 1
1) BAIT and SWITCH vs. CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE
Every contract consists of both an offer and acceptance. In every contract there is an Offeror and acceptor. The offer being the tail and the acceptor the head. Under contract law, title to whatever is offered transfers instantaneously upon acceptance, not upon payment like many seen to think. Payment, a consideration, is merely incidental. Attorney’s and Lawyers who write every contract used by corporations, including Government Corporations, know that the acceptor of the contract is in charge or what is known as the Holder in Due Course. Holder in Due Course is defined as: “Title Holder of the contract.” Thus, whenever you see any advertisement in the paper by a New Car Dealer offering you a new car at a certain price, and you’re attracted by what is offered, you run down to the car dealer and without knowing it become the victim of the oldest game of bait and switch in existence! Here is how the real shakedown works: After you settle on the car with all it’s options and the price with the dealership, you then sign your name to a contract, which in doing so, makes you the Offeror and the dealership the acceptor of that offer. It works the same identical way in every retail sale in the country, including Real Estate. You lose, because the seller is the Holder if the contract and in charge. That is the reason why you only get a carbon or photocopy of the contract. They keep the original contract and original signatures and obediently enter the property into commerce as the lawyers intended. It is a diabolical scheme! Whenever a Government Corporation sends you a letter, indictment or anything else charging that you violated some statute or code or that you owe some sort of tax or fine, think of that as an offer by the Government. For Example: let’s say you receive a bill for property taxes. This is an offer by the tax office just like the new car dealer. There are several options that you have when you get the bill. The number one option which most people take is to write out a check for the amount due. A check of course, is a debt instrument. Thus you are making a counter-offer to the tax collector, which they of course will accept, but the debt HAS NOT been extinguished. It is simply added to the PUBLIC DEBT. Once again, you have become the victim of a bait and switch!
Let’s use the same example as we’ve previously discussed and this time lets use a different tactic. Remember that the acceptor is in charge. This time lets simply Accept the “tax bill” for Value with the “right of charge back.” When you examine your property tax bill, you find out it is made out to a name (purportedly yours) in all capital letters. Which as you’ve already discovered is not you! It is a fiction created by the government. If you’ve done your homework, you’ve obtained a certified copy of your Birth Certificate from the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State where you were born and have filed your UCC-1 Financing Statement. Now you own all rights, title and interest in that all capital letter name character, including ALL contracts, mortgage and pledges. You’re now in charge of anything you want to do with the fiction. Accept the off and return it dollar for dollar for closure and discharge they may use your exemption social security number.
It works the same way with Internal Revenue Service. They send the fiction a “tax bill” for $20,000.00. You as the owner of the fiction, Accept their presentment for Honor and take it for Value as true place a value of $20,000,000.00, for example on it and notify whoever sent you the presentment that you now want a copy of their fiduciary tax return. You can request this because all of the money created uses your credit/labor as collateral. The amount you use is up to you. Only you can personally determine what value to place upon this trespass and violation of your property.
2) ADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING THE “AFFIDAVIT DENYING EXISTENCE OF CORPORATION!”
The words “Specific Negative Averment” which is what an “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” really amounts to, are taken verbatim out of Rule 9(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which in the Rule provides and describes exactly how to challenge corporate existence solvency, and capacity to sue and be sued.
The term “Averment” comes from the root “aver”: to declare or assert; to set out distinctly and formally; to allege. An averment is a positive declaration or affirmation of fact, especially and allegation. It is submitted in the form of an affidavit so as to invoke the superior credibility and power that comes with having unlimited commercial liability. As an honest, forthright, conscientious, sentient being you have nothing to hide or fear and so can state your position openly and fully by affidavit. Others with hidden agendas and skeletons in the closet need to hide behind their corporate mother’s skirts of only limited liability. They are too terrified of being held personally accountable for anything to step up to the commercial plate and swear out an affidavit stating anything.
Executing the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation’ requires the receiving/served party to respond by affidavit, both written in longhand in red ink and notarized in red ink and sent to you via the Notary Public, and further requires that they prove:
All if the various fictitious, non-existent, undefined assemblages of all capital letters, e.g. “INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,” etc. legally exist, i.e. are solvent, have standing in law, and can be present in a court; and
Each has a proven contractual nexus with all the others, including the artificial person represented by the corrupted, all- capital-letter version of your true name.
Failure to accomplish the above in the manner prescribed in the affidavit establishes on the record his/her/their confusion and consent of judgment that none of those entities exist. That there is no enforceable contract. You are not required to become involved in an imaginary dispute between non-existent entities!
It is crucial to realize, that the only way we can survive as a civilization is to cause truth to prevail. If history be our teacher, since it is so often stated: “History repeats itself and those who fail to learn from History, are doomed to repeat it,” is forever present. Any society functioning on lies, i.e. data contrary to the way things actually are and function, will fail. As it is, mankind on this planet is hell bent for dissolution and disappearance as a living species. This is no exaggeration. When thoughts, words, and deeds of billions of people are increasingly wrong, erroneous, and false, the natural cause/effect consequences of such futile efforts to violate the laws of existence self-function to assert their own integrity. All that is false and contrary to the truth of man’s basic nature and the nature of life eventually self-destructs as a consequence.
Establishing truth in situations requires exposing the actual nature of everything that is proffered. The entire system thrives and ravages the world because people accept the surface appearance of things at face value without looking for the underlying cause and exposing the truth of the matter so it can be recognized and understood. Reality’s game is “truth or consequences.” The consequence of acting contrary to truth begets ruin.
It is therefore essential to neutralize both of the ways people are damaged by the systematic war being waged against them by their so called “Public Servants” the commercial process and the “legitimacy” in the Law of Nations of War as a valid activity of nation States.
In certain circumstances, in compliment and simultaneously with the Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation, the “Accepted For Value” UCC Commercial Process and whatever other affidavits might be deployed, the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” is essential to neutralize the commercial aspect of the war, and the Affidavit, “Bill of Peace” is used to expose the naked aggression of the systematic war being waged under color of law.
Anyone who wants to deal with you who will “NOT COME CLEAN” and be honest, sincere, and well intentioned, is self-confessing to be:
Disregarding the truth and acting on lies, deceit, bad faith, and absence of full disclosure, and thereby announcing to you by their actions (and failures to act) that they are an aggressor, criminal con artist with no authority, and an enemy. Since no contract can be formed without genuine agreement- free consent and mutual meeting of the minds based on full disclosure, good faith, and truth no contract can result from your interaction with them other than the criminal contract formed unilaterally by them via their assault upon you. This further voids all and every basis upon which to require you to do anything they say or to have anything to do with them.
Acting on their own, with no legitimate authority whatsoever, and therefore personally liable in unlimited-commercial- liability capacity, i.e. NAKED!
Upon your opponents failure to answer or rebut your Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment and Execute your Bill of Peace a Notice of Default and Stipulation is thereby executed, served upon them and recorded in the Public Record.
3) ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE?
Once the “real, live, flesh and blood- individual has filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement with Security Agreement in place and taking “all rights, title and interest’ in ALL CAPITAL- LETTERS FICTION, ASSEMBLAGE, ARTIFICIAL PERSON (that very so-called name may be spelled with a first name, middle initial and last name) or Straw man/Woman” when a “person (agency or other public or private corporation)” submits a letter or form suggesting that you (when its really the fiction) are being charged with a debt, taxes or whatever, you send a personalized letter to the person who signed the letter of form or a person responsible for the letter or form being sent to the fiction.
That letter explains that you (the real deal) “Accept the Charge for Value.” This basically tells them you hold title to the FICTION and anything connected to the FICTION, it gives them NOTICE that they have committed a “Trespass against your property. Your Rights!” It sets in stone that you are “the Holder in Due Course.” This is a banking/securities term and requires a quick refresher definition.
“In every contract there must be an offer, acceptance and a consideration. Corporations specialize in bait-and-switch tactics to protect themselves in every contractual arrangement. Such as, when you see a home you like, the real estate agency may have “offered” the home for sale through various advertisements. This is an offer. You look at the home and like it and the price is right. You tell the real estate agent “Yes, I’ll take it! “At that point you have become the acceptor of the contract and of course the home and price is the consideration. From a legal standpoint, this contract is completed.
The offer, acceptance and consideration are completed right then. The acceptor is the one “in charge.” That at the moment could be you. Then comes the switch out. Now is when the bait-and-switch goes down. The real estate agent (unwittingly, as though ignorance of the law is any excuse or defense) then requires you to fill out a FORM in which you make an Offer and They the Seller become the Acceptor! The bait and switch is complete. That simple. You have now ”voluntarily” become a DEBTOR- “forever,” even if you paid cash for the place or latter pay of the mortgage. Why? Why can’t you pay it off? YOU CANNOT EXTINGUISH DEBTS WITH A DEBT INSTRUMENT (I.e. FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES)! -<[Debt + Debt – Debt; Credit + Credit – Credit, neither satisfy or cancel the obligation of payment and do not constitute payment]> Therefore you do not own a thing, nothing.
You have voluntarily made someone else the Holder in Due Course of the property. They accepted the instrument (contract) FOR VALUE. They now own the property. “All parts of the contract, including the deed are now “recorded in the property records. Look at your deed. It will have the, “FICTIONS” written in all capital letters. All we really do is add to the so-called National Debt whenever you pay those taxes and make that counteroffer, with the debt, however, not changing and remaining the same whenever you purchase anything in this manner. So when you receive a Notice of Property- taxes on your home, the taxing authority is really making you and “offer.” When you pay the taxes you are inking a counter-offer, because your payment will not extinguish the debt or cancel it out. They will accept your counter-offer, however, but the debt will still be there and come back the next year, every year until you stop it and take allodiall status to your property through a Land Patent.
By the way, the Notice of Property Tax due will be made out to your FICTION! Keep these things in mind when you purchase a home, land, auto, etc. You make the contract! Make the seller the Offeror and yourself (the real person with your; name spelled correctly) the acceptor of the offeror. This puts you officially in charge! Make gold and /or silver a part of the consideration to extinguish the debt. You will be the Holder in Due Course. YOU keep the original contract and give the Offeror a copy. Do not record- the contract unless you want to give up the allodial title to the property. Recordings are not required and the original, contract by itself is all you need to prove and establish ownership. To record is to turn over title to it.
Now with this explanation covered, lets move to the person who wrote the letter charging that you owed something. After filing UCC-1 Financing Statement and acquiring a Certified copy of it with Security Agreement you are now the Holder in Due Course of the property known as the FICTION or (Straw man) and any contract associated with him or her! Think of the letter as an OFFER and rather than making a counter-offer by paying, you now Accept the offer for Value. By Accepting for Value, you are saying, “I am the Holder in Due Course” and because you have become the ACCEPTOR of the offer, guess who is in charge? You are in charge and the Offeror has trespassed upon you and your PROPERTY! As the Secured Party Lien Holder of the PROPERTY and Holder in Due Course of the Debtor you now can set a value on the trespass. So if the Offeror has made the charge that your PROPERTY owes $25,000.00, you can Accept the offer as true and take it For Value and set a value on it literally for any amount you choose! Usually three times or triple damages plus twelve percent annual. You are going to tell this person to discharge the amount against your exempt status and provide your Employer Identification number for the Account Number to be charged. This will be directed to the Secretary of the Treasury in Washington, D.C. The person has three days in under the Truth-in-Lending-Act to do what has been ordered. In addition, you are going to request that this person send you his/her Fiduciary Tax Return, which would show they have filed and paid taxes on the amount. They won’t respond, so ten (10) days later you send a Second Request and at the same time send a letter of default and opportunity to cure. The rest we can teach you’re in Latter courses.
All of this done in accordance with Uniform Commercial Code, UCC3-419 and the Notarial Protest Process in accordance with House Joint Resolution (HJR-192) and will discharge all Public Debt.
Remember everything is a “charge” from every Government corporation or so called private corporation. A “Charge” is basically to IMPOSE a burden, duty, obligation, or lien.
In criminal law, to “charge” is to indict or formally accuse. Everything centers around a DEBTOR being charged and the CREDITOR making the accusation. To IMPOSE means to levy or exact, to lay as a burden, tax, duty or charge. Remember that ALL CHARGES are brought forth against a FICTION and if you (the real deal) controls all rights, title and interest in the FICTION, ALL CHARGES CAN BE DISCHARGED by you, the real person, on the other side of being “charged”, which is all a court of equity can do (all courts are courts of equity-bankruptcy), is to make a “claim.” A claim means a demand as one’s own or as one’s right. A FICTION, i.e., a public or private corporation, cannot make a claim against a real person. Only a real person can make a claim against a real person Corporations are FICTIONS and have no right to make claims.
This is a picture of “The Houses of Parliament” in London, England.
Let’s have a little quiz:
1. Who meets there?
2. What do they do there?
3. Do they help you in any way?
If your answers were:
1. “Members of the government”
2. “They represent all the people living in the country” and
3. “Yes, they create laws to protect me and my family”
Then let me congratulate you on getting every one of the answers wrong.
Didn’t do too well on that quiz? OK, let’s have another go:
4. When was slavery abolished?
5. Was slavery legal?
6. Are you in debt to a financial institution?
Here are the answers:
1. The serving officers of a commercial company.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from you.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not you.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and you yourself, are considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is “legal” although it is not “lawful” (you need to discover the difference).
6. No. You are NOT in debt to any financial institution.
Does this seem a little strange to you? If it does, then read on:
THOSE IN POWER HAVE A BIG SECRET
Paying tax is OPTIONAL !!
Getting a licence is OPTIONAL !!
Registering a vehicle is OPTIONAL !!
Paying a fine is OPTIONAL !!
Attending a court is OPTIONAL !!
YOU CAN IF YOU WANT TO, BUT YOU DON’T HAVE TO
Surprised? Well – try this for size:
Every Mortgage and Loan is FULLY REPAID from day one – you can pay it again if you want to, but you don’t have to !!
If nobody has told that you that you have a Strawman, then this could be a very interesting experience for you. Your Strawman was created when you were very young, far too young to know anything about it. But then, it was meant to be a secret as it’s purpose is to swindle you, and it has been used very effectively to do just that ever since it was created.
Perhaps it is about time that you learnt about your strawman and how you can stop it being used against you. Knowing about it is the most important first step. You need to go on a journey of discovery, and I’m afraid that what you are about to discover is not very pleasant. However, if you decide to act on what you learn, it could change your life for the better. If you think that you are in debt, then you can get out of it if you are willing to stand up for your rights and refuse to be swindled any longer. Interested? If so, then let’s start at the beginning and find out where your strawman came from and why you should care about it.
It all started when your parents had a happy event and you entered the world. You don’t know exactly when that was, because you were not aware of the days of the week, the months of the year or even what year it was.
Even after some months had gone by, you still were not aware of these things, but by that time, your strawman had already been created and it was being used to make some very unscrupulous people rich. None of this was your fault. It happened because your parents were fooled into thinking that they needed to register your birth and get a birth certificate for you. So, they APPLIED for a birth certificate, not understanding what would happen when they did. Well then, what did happen? According to the Local Authority:
1. They lost ownership of their baby (you).
2. They allowed a strawman to be created.
This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a strawman is or how it can be used against their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.
The registering of a baby’s birth actually passes “ownership” of the baby to the Local Authority and that, and that alone, allows the Local Authority staff to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that. This applies until the child reaches the ‘age of maturity’ set by the current legal statutes. Doing that is not “lawful” but after the birth has been registered, it is “legal” and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly.
So, what is a strawman? A strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope that as the child grows up, he will be fooled into believing that he is actually the strawman (which he most definitely is not) and pay all sorts of imaginary costs and liabilities which get attached to the strawman by con artists.
How is a strawman created? Well the mechanism involves that unnecessary birth certificate which the parents imagine is about, and belongs to, their baby (neither of which is actually true). If the baby has been named James and the family name is Martin, then you would expect the birth certificate to have the name James Martin written on it. If that is what is written on it, then all is well and it is a genuine birth certificate. However, if any other name is there, then the document is not a birth certificate but instead is the creation of a strawman masquerading as James Martin. The alternative entries might be any of the following examples: “JAMES MARTIN”, “Mr James Martin”, “Martin, Mr James” or anything else which is not exactly “James Martin” and nothing else.
Why create a strawman? The answer is ‘in order to charge the strawman imaginary costs and penalties and fool the human James Martin into paying those amounts’. These imaginary charges include ‘Income Tax’, ‘Council Tax’, ‘Inheritance Tax’, ‘Capital-Gains Tax’, ‘Road Tax’, ‘Import Tax’, ‘Value-Added Tax’, ‘Fuel Levy’, ‘Loan Interest’, ‘Bank Charges’ and anything else that full-time professionals can think up and are confident that you will not notice that you never agreed to pay and don’t need to pay.
Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you.
For example, they will say to you “Do you understand?” . In English, that means “Do you comprehend what I am saying to you?” and the automatic response would be “Yes”, meaning “I do comprehend what you are saying to me”. But these sneaky, underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean “Do you stand under me?” meaning “Do you grant me authority over you so that you have to obey whatever I tell you to do?”.
What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never tell you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don’t know what is! If you answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between you and them and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then, unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has most definitely, not occurred.
But what is the point in all this? Well, this manoeuvre is intended to trick you into agreeing to represent your strawman. Why? Aaah now, that is a good question, but to answer it takes a bit of explaining, and you need to understand the overall situation:
All humans are born equal, with complete freedom of choice and action. If you live in the same place as a lot of other people, then there are a few restrictions which have grown up, by common consent, over time. These restrictions are for your protection and the protection of the other people living near you. These restrictions are called “the Law” (or more accurately: “Common Law”) and they are few in number and very easy to understand. They are:
You must not injure or kill anyone.
You must not steal or damage things owned by somebody else.
You must be honest in your dealings and not swindle anyone.
These have resulted from hundreds of years of disputes which have been dealt with through using common sense and the opinions of ordinary people. They are the only limitations on you, and if you don’t want to abide by them, then you need to go to some isolated place and stay away from other people.
Many people think that there are hundreds of other laws which they have to keep (and new ones every other day), but that is not so. Those other things are called “statutes” and keeping them is optional for you, the human, BUT they are not optional for your fictitious strawman, and that is why the people who benefit from those things want to persuade you to represent your strawman and so become subject to all of their invented restrictions and charges.
If you knew that they were optional, would you agree to:
Give most of your earnings away in taxes and similar charges?
Pay to own a vehicle?
Pay to own a television set?
Pay to drive on roads which were built with your money?
Be forced to join armed services if you are told to?
Send an army which is supposed to represent you, into another country to murder innocent people there?
Were you ever told that these things are optional? If you agree to represent your strawman, then these things become binding on you. These are some of the “statutes” which ‘politicians’ keep inventing in order to make you poor, make them and their friends rich, and keep you in a position where you have to do everything they say, no matter how much that harms you and does away with your natural rights and freedom.
But, says somebody, we elect a government to represent us and so we have to do what they say, after all, they have our best interests at heart don’t they?
Well, that is a nice thought, but is it actually true? No it isn’t. You think that you elect politicians to represent you in your government, but that is not what you actually do. That is part of a very carefully fostered illusion intended to keep you in your place and giving most of your earnings away (typically, 80% of all you earn). Part of the secret is that what is supposed to be your ‘government’ is actually a privately owned, for-profit company and all that you do when voting, is help choose the serving officers inside that company. It will never make the slightest difference to what happens in the future as the company policy and actions are controlled by the owners of the company and they are not influenced in any way whatsoever by what you want.
Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it’s financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.
It gets even more ridiculous when you discover that The Devon and Cornwall Police is a company which has been taken over by a company owned by IBM which is paid an annual budget of £256,800,000 taken from members of the public. Gilbert and Sullivan would have loved this reality as a script for one of their comedies. Lancashire County Council was incorporated as a company (IP00666C) in 2002. It’s registered office was “3rd Floor, Christ Church Precinct, County Hall, Preston” and it was completely dissolved on 25th January 2008 and all of it’s Assets and Liabilities were transferred on 12th November 2007 to another company – “The Blues and Twos Credit Union Ltd.” whose registered address is Lancashire Police Headquarters, PO Box 77, Hutton, Preston. Do you by any chance get the feeling that you are being taken for a ride here?
Just in case you are not aware of it, the purpose of any commercial ‘for-profit’ company or corporation is to make money for it’s owners (and shareholders if there are any). The people whom you think of as ‘The Government’ don’t do anything which earns money – instead, they take money from you and their main job is to make sure that you don’t realise that they are in the same position as IBM which takes away a cool £256 million of your money every year.”
So, why all the pretence of there being a genuine government which you elect and who serve you? They don’t want you to understand that they are just running a company which produces nothing of any worth – something like a betting shop, where almost every customer loses money – and wake up to the fact that, unlike what you have been told all your life, this is all optional and you don’t need to play their rip-off game any longer unless you want to.
They want you to be so burdened down with paying them money and working so hard and so long that you don’t have the time, money or energy to stop and think about what is happening to you and your family.
They are desperate to stop you from just walking away from their scam, and so they make every effort to connect you with the fiction which is your strawman because fictitious entities like commercial companies can’t have any dealing with a real man or a real woman – they can only deal with another fiction like your strawman, and it is essential that they fool you into believing that you have to act on behalf of your strawman – which you don’t.
They have a number of well-proven methods of distracting you and keeping you from finding out. They want you to see a great deal of entertainment, not because there is anything wrong with entertainment, but while you are watching it you will not be asking awkward questions. Also, they are very careful that most entertainment reinforces their make-believe world and makes it appear to be “the real world” where everyone is under ‘The Government’, Police Officers uphold the law, taxes are essential in order to keep things going and things which are said to be bad for you, are taxed heavily (not to make money) but supposedly, to encourage you to avoid those things.
They also have another very effective technique, and that is fear. They want you to be afraid. Afraid of imaginary terrorists. Afraid of disasters. Afraid of new diseases. Afraid of foreign countries. Afraid of “the economy” doing badly and inflation rising. If you doubt this, then take a look at the news and count the number of positive, uplifting news items, and the number of negative or depressing news items. It doesn’t take much in the way of research to see the very heavy negative bias in the news. The reason behind this is to make you feel that you need a government and an army to protect you from these supposed dangers. It is easy to keep the news items biased that way, because all of the major news agencies and media outlets in the world are owned by only five or six privately owned commercial companies.
So to supposedly connect you to the strawman which they created for you when your birth was registered, they use the Legalese technique of conning you with the Name of the strawman. If you are ill-advised enough to go to a Court (which is a Corporate place of Business) as the accused, you will be asked to confirm your name, quoting the full name shown on your birth certificate, which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY. Titles such as Mr, Dr, Lord, PC, QC, or whatever are not asked for as they are not required. The “Accused” is actually the LEGAL PERSONALITY which is the name on the birth certificate, so when they ask for the person’s NAME, they are talking to the LEGAL PERSONALITY and not the human. This is because a human cannot exist in the legal world – only pieces of paper can, and that is something which they are very careful not to tell you.
This is a really key issue. Natural Law and Common Law are the only laws which apply to humans and they deal only with harming other people or causing them loss, and outside of those restrictions, a human has free and unlimited entitlement to do anything he chooses which complies with these principles. As opposed to this, Acts of Parliament, “Statutes” and Statutory Instruments “Contracts” do not apply to the human but only to the piece of paper which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY and which has no reality. As the legal fiction of the LEGAL PERSONALITY was created by the company called “the United Kingdom Corporation”, it is that company which gets to say what the rights and duties are for that piece of paper.
When a person is born in Britain, the mother and father submit a Birth Certificate Registration Form, which is a piece of paper. There is no requirement under common law to do this. When any limited company or corporation is set up, there is always a Certificate of Registration in order to create it’s LEGAL PERSONALITY and that is a piece of paper. Please note that a British Birth Certificate states quite clearly that it is not evidence of identity, that means that, it has nothing to do with any human. Marked on it is “Crown Copyright” showing clearly that it does not belong to an individual and was created by the crown. This act of Registering a child, makes that child a “ward of the court” and the child can be taken away from the parents at any time. The Legalese definitions of words which sound commonplace, can be found in Black’s Law Dictionary and the current edition is the eighth.
Another trick they try to play on you is to imply that a Summons is something which you MUST obey while in fact, it is only an Invitation to attend their place of business. They are NOT inviting you, the man, but instead, they are inviting a LEGAL PERSONALITY to their place of business, and please note that there is a CHOICE as it is only an invitation. The LEGAL PERSONALITY is just a piece of paper, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE created by the commercial company called “The United Kingdom Corporation” and it is not the human. You can’t be forced into a contract, so they have to deceive you into entering into one without understanding what you are doing. They are using deception as every Magistrates Court is a trading name of the commercial company called “The Ministry of Justice” D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526 which does not have a Parent Company listed meaning that it is a Parent Company itself. Legal people on being shown this company registration, responded by saying that if this information is genuine (which it is), then the UK has been lawless for more than 400 years because the whole Justice System is being dealt with by a commercial company.
Going to court in connection with any civil action, is a very bad idea as the only function of a court is to judge between two parties who disagree and then penalise the loser. The court doesn’t care who wins or loses, and the objective of the court is to make a profit for it’s owners as it is a commercial enterprise and it’s purpose is to acquire money from anybody who is fool enough to attend. If you look at the Summons (which is really an invitation) to go to court, you will see that it is not in your name, but in the name of the strawman which they are hoping to fool you into representing.
Dealing With “Debt” Because of the very high percentage of the money earned being taken away from the average person, it is not unusual for people to end up with what looks like “debt”. Most people spend their time worrying over the statement of what they are told they owe, and do endless calculations to see if they agree with the numbers which they have been sent. Again, this is the sort of misdirection which magicians use to fool audiences, distracting their attention away from where the action is really taking place. Here, the question is really not “How much is owed?” but instead it is “Is anything actually owed?”.
You need to remember that any financial institution is a legal fiction and does not actually exist. As a result of this, it can only deal with other legal fictions (essentially, other pieces of paper) and it can’t have any dealings with a man or a woman as they are not legal fictions. It is also important to understand what passes for money nowadays. Let’s say our trusty friend James Martin goes looking for a loan and he fills in an application form with the Swindle Bank Limited for £10,000. Interestingly, the form which he is asked to sign, says that he has already received the £10,000 although the loan has not yet been approved.
The next day, the loan is approved and James is handed a cheque which he is asked to sign and lodge to his account with the bank. We won’t follow up on that very interesting procedure at this time, but please remember that he has now provided two signatures for £10,000 in the strawman name, and all he has received is a 1 and four zeros in the accounts of the Swindle Bank Limited.
All goes well for several months until James loses his job and does not manage to get another one. This is financial trouble which he does not know how to deal with. Time goes by and James has not had sufficient money to make payments against his loan from the Swindle Bank Limited. He starts getting letters from the bank saying that he must pay the arrears immediately and keep up with the payments in future. There is not the slightest chance of that happening as James just does not have the money and he does not know what to do.
Fortunately, Peter, the next door neighbour of James happens to be an independent financial advisor with years of experience, and James has the brainwave of asking him for help. Peter is willing to help and so he sits down and goes through all of the paperwork. Then he tells James: “You must not ignore this situation. Write back immediately and say that you agree to pay any financial obligation which you might lawfully owe, ON CONDITION that they:
1. Provide validation of the debt, that is, the actual accounting.
2. Verification of their claim against you, that is, a signed Invoice.
3. A copy of the Contract binding both parties (you and them), and send that letter by recorded delivery so that there is an independent witness to it having been delivered.”
Every letter you write should be marked clearly “Without Prejudice” which means that you reserve all your lawful rights and accept no contract unless it is shown to be lawful by meeting the four conditions essential to a lawful, binding contract, namely:
Full Disclosure (you were not told that you were actually creating the credit with your signature)
Equal Consideration (they brought nothing of value to the table and so have nothing to lose)
Lawful Terms and Conditions (yours were actually based on fraud), and
The signatures of both parties (corporations can’t sign because they have no Right or Mind to contract since they are soul-less legal fictions, and no third party can sign a contract on their behalf)
Peter then tells James that agreeing to pay, provided that evidence of a lawful debt can be produced, stops him being taken to court because courts only adjudicate between parties who are in dispute, and as James has agreed to pay, there is no dispute, so the court would not accept any application for a hearing. If the Swindle Bank were foolish enough to try, James has only to send the court a copy of his letter agreeing to pay and the case would be thrown out immediately (and the Bank might well be penalised for wasting court time).
The bank is now in trouble as it has been running a con game on James and so can’t produce the documents for which James has asked. The request by James was reasonable in every respect. However, a loan agreement is a contract and so there has to be full disclosure of all the details (which there wasn’t), both sides have to put up something of equal worth (which didn’t happen) and the contract has to be signed by both parties (which the bank can’t do). So, the bank has a real problem.
The bank will probably send a Statement of what it wants James to believe is the outstanding amount. James should return this with a polite note saying that a Statement is not an Invoice, so would they please provide a signed Invoice as requested. They will also probably send a photocopy of his Loan Application form, at which point James should write back and point out politely that it does not constitute a contract as it is only signed by one of the parties (himself) and he has asked for a copy of the Contract signed by both parties.
The bank is likely to go silent at this point and stop corresponding with James. James should then write again, requesting that the necessary documents be sent to him within the next fourteen (or perhaps 28) days, and if that does not happen, then he will consider the debt to be fully discharged.
The bank will either remain silent or write back to say that the debt is fully discharged. If the bank tries phoning, then just tell them politely that you only wish to deal with this matter in writing, and ring off. If the bank remains silent for the stated period, then James should write back stating that due to the bank’s failure to provide the necessary evidence of a lawful debt within the reasonable time provided, that James now considers that the debt is fully discharged and ask the bank to confirm that in writing. The bank will normally write back confirming that the debt is fully discharged and that there is nothing owing and if it does not do that, then it will just stop asking for any further payments.
The reasons for how and why this takes place, takes a good deal of explaining and many people find it difficult to understand. So, it is covered in detail here. Many people think that this process sounds like you ripping off the bank, but this is definitely not the case.
What is money?
Originally in England, the unit of money was called “one pound sterling”. That was because it was literally, sterling silver a weighing one pound. As it was quite difficult to carry several pounds weight of currency round with you, it was arranged that the actual silver could be held in a bank and a promissory note which was essentially, a receipt for the deposit of each pound of silver, was issued. It was much easier to carry these “bank notes” around and to do business with them. If you wanted to, you could always take these notes to a bank and ask for them to be cashed, and what happened then was that the bank would hand you the equivalent weight of sterling silver in exchange for the notes.
Today, the currency in England is still “bank notes” which are certainly easier to carry around, but there is one very important difference. These notes are issued by the private company called “The Bank of England” (which is as good a name for a company as any other name). However, if you were to take one of their bank notes to the premises of that company and ask for it to be cashed, all that they would do is give you another note with the same number of pounds written on it, or alternatively, some other notes with smaller numbers printed on them. This is because, unlike the original bank notes, there is nothing of any physical value backing up the bank notes of today – they are only worth the physical paper on which they are printed.
It actually gets worse than that. What happens most commonly nowadays is that they do not even bother printing those pieces of paper. Now, they just tap some numbers into a computer record, or if they are old-fashioned enough, they write the numbers into a ledger. What do those numbers represent? Nothing at all – they have no actual value, in other words, just as much value as if you typed them into your own computer – quite meaningless. And yet, a bank or other financial institution will merrily “lend” you those numbers in return for years of your work – now isn’t that really generous of them?
Actually, this is not at all funny, because if you don’t keep paying them money earned by your very real work, then they will attempt to take your house and possessions away from you. This won’t happen if you understand that what they lent you was actually valueless. Take the case of Jerome Daly of Minnesota in America. In court, Jerome challenged the right of the bank to foreclose on his home which had been purchased with a loan from the bank. Jerome argued that any mortgage contract required that both parties (that is, himself and the bank), to put up a legitimate form of property for the exchange. In legal language, that is called a legitimate “consideration” put forward by both parties to the contract.
Jerome explained that the “money” was in fact, not the property of the bank as it had been created out of nothing as soon as the loan agreement was signed. That is, the money does not come out of the bank’s existing assets as the bank is simply inventing it and in reality, the bank is putting up nothing of it’s own, except for a theoretical liability on paper. As the court case progressed, the President of the bank, Mr Morgan, took the stand and admitted that the bank, in combination with the (privately owned commercial company called) “The Federal Reserve Bank”, created the entire amount of the loan in credit in it’s own books by means of a bookkeeping entry, the money and credit coming into existence when they created it. Further, Mr Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and must be tendered to support the loan agreement. The jury found that there had been no lawful consideration put forward by the bank and so the court rejected the bank’s application for foreclosure and Jerome Daly kept his home.
That is exactly the situation with all British mortgages. When someone makes an application for a mortgage or any other loan, the applicant’s signature is required on the application form before the loan is approved. That signed application is a valuable piece of paper which the bank can lodge in it’s accounts as a credit to the bank for the amount of the loan. The bank could just keep that application form and stay £100,000 or whatever, ahead, but they want more, much more. They want the borrower to pay them that same amount again, funding it by years of work, and not only the amount of the supposed “loan” but significant extra in interest. Why do you think that they are so keen to lend you “money” – they are even willing to lend to people with very poor credit records as there is no way that the bank can lose out on the deal, no matter what happens.
This is why, if a company starts demanding payment of large sums of money, you start by asking them to provide the “accounting” for the deal. In other words, you are asking them to show in writing that they provided something of genuine worth as their side of the loan contract. As they invented the money as numbers in their books with no real worth attached to those numbers, they are in deep trouble as they can’t comply with your demand to see their accounting for the deal. Did you ever wonder how the average bank manages to make hundreds of millions of pounds profit every year? Well, you are looking right at where a large chunk of it comes from.
This next part of the information may be a little difficult to understand. When any business is being run, the accounts are recorded as money coming in and money going out. For a bank, the money coming in is called a “Credit” and money going out is called a “Debit”. The objective is to have these two amounts match each other for any customer. Not everything done in banking is immediately obvious to the average person and so it may be a little difficult to understand how everything works in this area.
If you have an account with a bank and you deposit £500 to open the account, the bank enters that in it’s books as a Credit. The Credit on your account is £500 and the Debit is £0 and so the balance has a positive, or Credit value of £500.
If you were to withdraw £600, then the bank would record this as a Debit of £600 and as the Credit balance on your account is £500, the balance on your account would be £100 in Debit, that is, overdrawn by £100.
If you were to lodge a further £100 and then close your account, the bank would not have any problem, other than the fact that they would like to keep you on as a customer. As far as the accounting goes, your account is balanced and the bank is satisfied with the state of affairs, £600 has come in and £600 has gone out, the books balance – case closed.
Now, if you were to apply for a loan (mortgage or otherwise) for £100,000 from the bank, they would give you an application form which is set out in such a way that you have to fill in the strawman’s name rather than your own – separate boxes with one of them containing “Mr” and they may even require you to fill the form in using block capitals. You may think that the capitals are so that they can read you writing or perhaps, to make it easier for it to be entered into a computer, but the name in those capital letters belongs to the strawman and not to you. You have actually just made an application on behalf of the strawman and not on behalf of yourself!
You might wonder why they would want to do that. After all, what could they ever get from the strawman? Well, you might be surprised. When the strawman was incorporated they assigned a large monetary value to it, possibly £100,000,000 and they have been trading on the stock market on behalf of the strawman ever since, and you know how many years that has been. So, very surprisingly, in their opinion, the little fellow is really very rich, and you have just authorised them to take the amount of your loan application from the strawman’s account. So before the bank passes you any money, it has already got it’s money from the strawman account and entered it in it’s books as a £100,000 Credit to your loan account. They then place £100,000 into your loan account as a Debit. Interestingly, that loan account is now balanced and could easily be closed off as a completed deal.
This is where the sneaky part comes in. To get the money out of your account, you have to write and sign a cheque for £100,000 on that account. What does the bank do with cheques which you sign? It assigns them to the account as an asset of the bank, and suddenly, the bank is ahead by £100,000 because the cheque is in the name of the strawman who can supply the bank with almost any amount of money. But it doesn’t end there, as the bank is confident that you know so little about what is going on that you will pay them anything up to £100,000 over the years, against what you believe you owe them! If that happens, then they have made yet another £100,000 for the bank. To make things even better for them, they want you to pay them interest on the money which you (don’t actually) owe them. Overall, they make a great deal of money when you borrow from them, so perhaps you can see now why banks make hundreds of millions in profit each year.
If the loan was used to buy a property, then the bank probably insisted that you lodged the title deeds with them as soon as the property deal was completed. If you then fail to keep paying them, they are likely to attempt to foreclose on the “loan” and sell your property quickly for an even greater profit. And to add insult to injury, if the property sale did not exceed the amount of the “loan” plus the charges for selling it, then they are likely to claim that you owe them the difference!
Perhaps you can now see why Jerome Daly told them to go take a running jump at themselves, and why your asking for “the accounting” for any loan made to you, puts the bank in an impossible situation. If the bank then just writes and says that the “debt” is fully discharged, they still have made a massive profit on the operation and they also hope that the vast majority of customers will not catch on to the fact that they are paying far too much or even that there is a strawman involved.
Please don’t feel that you are ripping the banks off if you don’t pay them what they are asking you to pay – they have already recovered everything paid out before you start paying them for the second or third time.
When it is a Mortgage the entire process is very much the same. The Debt-Free Sovereign website gives a very clear description of the process in Canada, and the process everywhere else is much the same. They describe a typical property sale and mortgage this way:
The buyer goes to Magic Bank in response to the bank’s claim that it is in the business of lending money in accordance to its corporate charter. The buyer went to the bank believing that Magic Bank had the asset (money) to lend. Magic Bank never tells its customers the truth that it does not have any money to lend, nor that Magic Bank is not permitted to use their depositors’ money to lend to its borrowers.
Notwithstanding the fact that Magic Bank does not have any money to lend, Magic Bank makes the buyer/borrower sign a mortgage loan application form which is essentially a promissory note that the buyer/borrower promises to pay Magic Bank for the money (what money?) which he is supposed to receive from Magic Bank even before any value or consideration is received by the buyer/borrower from Magic Bank. This promissory note is a valuable consideration, a receivable and therefore an asset transferred from the buyer to the bank which Magic Bank enters into its own asset account as a cash deposit.
After making sure that the buyer has the ability to pay the required monthly payments (the buyer has credit), Magic Bank agrees to lend the buyer the money (cash) to pay the seller. Magic Bank has no money to lend but it gave the buyer a promise to lend money by way of a commitment letter, loan approval letter, loan authorisation or loan confirmation letter, etc., signed by a bank official or loans/mortgage officer employed by Magic Bank.
Magic Bank’s acceptance of the buyer’s promissory note made the bank liable to the buyer/borrower for the full face value of the promissory note which is the agreed purchase price of the property, less any cash deposit or down payment money paid by the buyer directly to the seller. It is important to note at this point that all real estate transactions require that the property being sold must be conveyed by the seller to the buyer free of all liens and encumbrances which means that all liens such as existing mortgages, judgments, etc. must be paid before the property can be mortgaged by the buyer as collateral to the mortgage loan which is yet to be received by the buyer pursuant the promise made by Magic Bank. How can the seller pay off his mortgage and obtain clear title if he has not yet received any money from the buyer? And how can the buyer mortgage a property that does not yet belong to him?
This dilemma is solved using Magic Bank’s magic tricks. Magic Bank, in concert with other magicians, the bank’s lawyers or notaries, causes all the liens and encumbrances to magically disappear by using a cheque drawn in the name of Magic Bank backed by the buyer’s promissory note and the agreement of purchase and sale. This cheque is deposited into the lawyer’s trust account. In essence, Magic Bank and it’s magicians, the lawyers and notaries used the buyer’s promissory note as the cash to enable the purchase agreement. It was the buyer’s promissory note that made the conveyancing possible. Magic Bank caused the property to be conveyed to the buyer from the seller clear title, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The property now belongs to the buyer which makes it possible for the buyer to mortgage the property to Magic Bank. The buyer paid for it using his own promissory note.
At this point, the seller has not yet received any money or cash so Magic Bank and it’s magicians must perform more magic in order to satisfy the seller’s requirement that he must get paid or the whole deal is null and void. The seller does not even know that the property had been magically conveyed to the buyer’s name in order for the seller to receive any money.
The ensuing magic trick is accomplished this way. The buyer is made to sign another promissory note. The mortgage contract is attached to the bottom of the promissory note which makes the buyer liable to pay Magic Bank for the money or the loan which the buyer has not yet or will never receive for up to twenty five years or more depending on the term of the mortgage contract. This note is linked to the collateral through the mortgage contract and as such, it is valuable to Magic Bank.
Magic Bank then goes to Bank of Canada or to another bank through it’s accomplice, the Canadian Payment Association to pledge the deal that they have just got from the buyer for credit. Bank of Canada then gives Magic Bank the “credit”. Remember, it is not Magic Bank’s credit, it was the buyer’s credit who promised to pay Magic Bank if and when the money is received by the buyer from Magic Bank, payable for up to 25 years or more.
Note: What happened above is basically a “swap”, a transaction all banks do to ‘monetise’ security. In this case, the second promissory note that is linked to the mortgage contract and signed by the buyer is a mortgage-backed security.
Magic Bank will then agree to pay Bank of Canada a certain percentage of interest over “prime”. Thus the buyer’s loan package goes to Bank of Canada which credits Magic Bank with the full amount of credit which is the total amount of the money Magic Bank is entitled to receive after 25 years which is the amount of the principal plus all the interest payments the buyer has promised to pay to Magic Bank for 25 years or more which is usually three times the amount of the money promised by Magic Bank to the buyer. By magic, Magic Bank just enriched itself and got paid in advance, without using or risking it’s own money.
Magic Bank’s magician, the lawyer who holds the cheque that is backed by the buyer’s original promissory note, then writes a cheque to the seller as payment for the property. In effect, the buyer paid the seller with his own money by virtue of the fact that it was the buyer’s own money (the promissory note) that made the purchase and sale possible. Magic Bank just made a cool 300% profit without using or risking any capital of its own. Neither was there any depositor’s money deducted from Magic Bank’s asset account in this transaction.
What really happened was pure deception and if we the people tried to do this, we would end up in prison being found guilty of fraud and criminal conversion not to mention that the property would have been seized by the court.
This is only a crime if we, the people, do it to each other, as it would be an indictable crime if we issue a cheque with no funds. There would not be any deal, no purchase and sale agreement because there is no valuable consideration. In order to de-criminalise the transaction, we need Magic Bank and their cohorts to make the deal happen. It is really a conspiracy of sorts but these “persons”, the banks, the lawyers, the land title offices or even the courts do not consider the transaction as fraudulent transactions because these transactions happen all the time.
Such a contract is “void ab-initio” or “void from the beginning” which meant that the contract never took place in the first place. Moreover, the good faith and fair dealing requirement through full disclosure is non-existent which further voids the contract. Magic Bank failed to disclose to the buyer that it will not be giving the buyer any valuable consideration and taking interest back as additional benefit to unjustly enrich the corporation. Magic Bank also failed to disclose how much profit they are going to make on the deal.
Magic Bank led the buyer to believe that the money going to the seller would be coming from its own asset account. They lied because they knew, or ought to have known, that their own book or ledger would show that Magic Bank does not have any money to lend and that their records will show that no such loan transaction ever took place. Their own book will show that there would be no debits from Magic Bank’s asset account at all and all that would show up are the two entries made when the buyer gave Magic Bank the first collateral or the promissory note which enabled Magic Bank to cut a cheque which made it possible to convey the property from seller to the buyer free and clear of all liens or encumbrances as required by the agreement of purchase and sale entered into in writing between the buyer and the seller. What really happened was not magic; in reality, the buyer’s promissory note was used by Magic Bank and it’s magicians – the lawyers and land title clerks, to convey free title to the buyer from the seller. So why do we need the mortgage contract?
The other entry that would show up when we audit Magic Bank’s accounts, is the other pledge of collateral including the buyer’s promissory note which was converted (unlawfully and without disclosure or permission from the buyer) into a mortgage-backed security which was “swapped” or deposited by Magic Bank to Bank of Canada and “cleared” through the Canadian Payment Association for which another deposit was entered into Magic Bank’s transaction account.
From the above, we can list all the criminal acts perpetrated by Magic Bank:
The mortgage contract was “void ab-initio” because Magic Bank lied and never intended to lend a single cent of their own asset or depositor’s money to the buyer.
A valid contract must have lawful or valuable consideration. The contract failed for anticipated breach. Magic Bank never planned to give the buyer/borrower any valuable consideration.
Magic Bank breached all its fiduciary duties to the buyer and is therefore guilty of criminal breach of trust by failing in it’s good faith requirement.
Magic Bank concealed the fact from the buyer that it would be using the buyer’s promissory notes; first to clear all the liens and encumbrances in order to convey clear title to the buyer and then use the second promissory note to obtain more money from Bank of Canada or other institutions that buy and sell mortgage-backed security. Magic Bank received up to three times the amount of money required to purchase the property and kept the proceeds to itself without telling the buyer.
Magic Bank violated its corporate charter by lending “credit” or “nothing at all” to the buyer and then charging interests on this make-believe loan. Banks are only licensed to lend their own money, not other people’s money. Magic Bank used the buyer’s promissory note to clear the title which essentially purchased the property from the seller. The transaction is “an ultra vires” transaction because Magic Bank has engaged in a contract outside of it’s lawful mandate. An ultra vires contract is void or voidable because it is non-existent in law.
Everyone involved in this undertaking with Magic Bank, starting with the loan or mortgage officer, the lawyers, the land title office and even the central bank are equally guilty by association by aiding and abetting Magic Bank in it’s commission of it’s crimes against the buyer and the people who would eventually have to absorb all of the loss through increased taxes, etc.
In the final analysis, Magic Bank and the others who profited from the ultra vires transaction are all guilty of unjust enrichment and fraud for deceiving the buyer and the people, and for acting in concert in this joint endeavor to deceive the buyer.
Dealing With The Police Years ago, a policeman was your friend and defender. Things have changed now that Police Forces have become commercial organisations, dedicated to producing a profit by taking money from you in the form of Fixed Penalty Notices, Speeding Fines, Parking Fines and any number of other charges. It was stated on national TV this morning that in the last thirteen years, three thousand additional offences have been invented.
As each individual Police Force is a commercial company, in a way, not unlike a McDonalds Restaurant in strategy, it has no authority to enforce anything, any more than a McDonalds has. The men and women who work under the banner of their local Police Force have two separate roles. When they take up their occupation, they take an oath of office, pledging to uphold the law. That oath, and nothing else, gives them the authority to act to enforce Common Law – that is, the few things which are listed near the start of the “Legalese” section of this web site. It does not authorise them to do anything connected with so-called “government” statutes and so they have been trained to use Legalese to entrap uninformed members of the public. To be fair, it is highly likely that members of the police force are not aware of what they are doing and do not understand the difference between “legal” statutes (which are optional) and the “lawful” Common Law requirements which apply to everyone and are not optional.
Please don’t get me wrong. Most policemen and policewomen do a great job and assist members of the public, often above and beyond the requirements of their job – opposing bullying, intimidation, fraud, etc. and comforting in cases of bereavement or injury. Admittedly, the commercial companies who control the Police Forces are working hard to end this sort of positive behaviour, using ridiculous “Health and Safety” regulations as an excuse, even to the extent that police officers are instructed to stand by and watch somebody drown and not attempt to save them. This is not the choice of the officer but the instructions of the owners of the company.
Because these thousands of invented offences don’t apply to anybody unless they agree to be bound by them, it becomes essential for a police officer to (possibly inadvertently) persuade a member of the public to agree to subject himself to these unnecessary restrictions and agree to pay invented cash penalties to the local commercial company called the “Police Force” or “Constabulary”. The normal first attempt to establish this spurious dominance of the police officer is by him asking for your name. This is not an innocent question and it is essential that you are very careful in what you say as there are verbal Legalese booby traps all over the place.
One suitable reply is “The law does not require me to provide that information” which is entirely correct and avoids pitfall number one, and no matter how often the question is asked, the answer is always the same. It is also vitally important not to argue with a police officer as that is another Legalese booby trap which makes you subject to the thousands of hateful regulations designed to part you from your money. So, only answer questions (ideally with a non-aggressive question) and don’t volunteer any information at all.
If the police officer says “You were exceeding the speed limit”, you could say “Was I?” as you don’t argue, nor do you point out that Common Law does not require anyone to keep to speed limits, obey road signs, park only where directed, etc. even though that is perfectly true.
As mentioned before, if the police officer says “Do you understand?” then your response should be “No! I do NOT stand under you in this matter”. As before, the question is a Legalese trap and has nothing whatsoever to do with understanding anything which has been said.
Under Common Law, an offence has only been committed if there is a victim (somebody who has been killed or injured, had possessions damaged or stolen or who has been defrauded). So, if the police officer keeps pushing you to agree to pay his company money when you don’t need to, then a good question to ask might be “Who is the victim?”. An alternative is to ask “What is the charge, or am I free to go?”. If you stick to these things, then the police officer has nothing to work on as you have not agreed to be bound by statutes, you have not provided a name and address for him to write on an Invoice (or “Fixed Penalty Notice” as they like to call it) and you have not entered into a “controversy” by arguing with him or into “dishonour” by refusing him point blank.
There is one other thing, and that is, without being aggressive or offensive in any way, you must not do anything which he tells you to do because if you do, then those charming Legalese people can see that as you agreeing to “stand under” him and become subject to his “legal” (not “lawful”) authority, and so become liable to those thousands of cunning plans called “statutes”, carefully crafted in order to rob you in a perfectly “legal” way.
One thing which any police officer needs to become aware of is the fact that they do not have any security provided by the Police Force which employs them. In any situation which does not involve Common Law, the police officer is on his own, acting as an individual and as such is wide open to action against him either under Common Law if he is acting unlawfully or by civil court action if his actions warrant it. If there is failure to establish “Joinder” or more aptly named “pretensive joinder”, (which is where a human agrees voluntarily to represent the strawman and so become subject to statutes), then the presumed authority of a police officer does not exist in any respect and he is acting solely as an individual whose only authority is to enforce Common Law and nothing else.
Registration Most people believe that when they buy a new car that they have to register it (in Britain, with the commercial company known as the “Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency”). What very few people are aware of is the fact that the act of applying for registration actually transfers the physical ownership of the vehicle from you the purchaser who paid the money, to the Licensing Authority who licenced the vehicle. That is, you have just given the vehicle away to a commercial company who has done nothing at all for you and which does not have your best interests at heart. As it is unlawful to swindle anyone, I would be most interested to hear any reason whatsoever as to why this registration should not be deemed to be unlawful as I can’t think of any reason or basis why this should not be considered blatant and obvious fraud, and there has certainly not been full disclosure of the terms of the contract.
The change of ownership is shown by the fact that you, the previous owner, are now sent a document stating that you are now “the Registered Keeper” of the vehicle which you have just bought. You are left to pay for maintaining the vehicle which you do not own, and the actual owner can, and will, destroy the vehicle (which cost the owner nothing) if you, the ‘Registered Keeper’ do not keep on paying for the use of the vehicle. Destroying the vehicle would be unlawful if the vehicle did not belong to the company doing the destroying.
The vehicle will be crushed if the “Road Tax” is not paid. That ‘tax’ is substantial and was originally introduced as a fund contributed to by the drivers of vehicles, in order to build new roads for those vehicles to drive on, and to maintain all existing roads. That was a very reasonable idea, and it means that all the roads in the country belong to the people who paid the money for them to be built and repaired.
That Road Tax Fund has been hi-jacked and I have seen reports that state that 85% of that money is taken for other things which are in no way related to roads or driving. Local Authorities say that they can’t maintain roads properly as they do not have sufficient funds to do the work. The ‘Road Tax’ is increased for vehicles with large engines on the laughable excuse that they burn more fuel and so contribute more to global warming. The real reason for the increase is, as ever, just a method of taking more money from people who have no idea what is going on. There is even a proposal now, that motorists be charged for every mile that they drive along the roads which they paid for and own.
That, of course, is not the only stream of income from vehicles. A major source of income is from the massive ‘tax’ on fuel for vehicles, and it has been stated that an incredible 85% of the selling price is the proportion which is not needed for the location, extraction, processing and delivery of the actual fuel. In passing it can be remarked that vehicles can be run on water, compressed air, energy direct from the environment, permanent magnets, and even on gravity. It, no doubt, will come as a great shock to you that the inventors who have done this have disappeared suddenly as soon as they started testing their prototypes. Far fetched? I personally know five people who have been told to “cease and desist – or else”. When you understand the billions and billions in profit which are made through selling oil products, actions like that become very understandable, especially since the people who do these things own the police forces and courts and so they know that there will be no comeback no matter what they do.
You would think that there could be no further money to be squeezed out of the person who buys a car, but that is not the case. There are two further major charges. The first is an import duty on vehicles brought into the country from outside and that can be a substantial amount. The second is a most damaging charge called “Value Added Tax” in Britain and “Sales Tax” elsewhere. That tax is at present, 17.5% and forms a major increase in the selling price of almost everything. No matter how much your earned income is taxed, the remainder will be used to make purchases, almost all of which will be taxed themselves and the components used in their manufacture, transport and advertising are themselves taxed, raising the price even further. When these things are taken into account, it has been estimated that 80% of a person’s earnings is taken away by the various taxes and other unnecessary charges. Professional economists have stated that the supposedly-free people living in ‘democratic’ Britain are actually substantially worse off than the ‘serf’ slaves of earlier times – so much for ‘freedom’ !
So, what about the Driving Licence or in America, the Driver’s Licence? Under Common Law, humans have the right to travel freely and these days, that includes using a vehicle when travelling. The Legalese people want to persuade you that you are no longer a “Traveller” under Common Law, but instead, you are a “Driver” subject to their statutes, and they demand that a “Driver” must have a driving licence, car tax, car insurance, and anything else that they can think up. If you wish to live in freedom and somebody asks to see your licence (which would have been issued by your ‘begging’ for the supply of one and so subjecting yourself voluntarily to their authority by doing so), then the question is “Why would I want one of those?”.
A driving licence is only needed for the driver of a vehicle which is taking part in commerce. It can be argued that transporting a strawman is a commercial undertaking, so it would be advisable not to have anything related to a strawman with you. It is also very important not to give your name, address or (supposed) date of birth or to show any form of ID as that places you in a position of voluntary submission by:
(a) Obeying the command of another human being (who is of equal standing to you) and/or
(b) Associating yourself with, and consequently representing, a strawman who is automatically subject to all statutes, being itself, a legal fiction and part of that fictional world.
So, if you are not carrying a passenger who is paying for the journey and you are not stopping off on the journey to sell things and you are not transporting a strawman, then you are not a “Driver” with a “Passenger”, but instead, you are a “Traveller” with a “Guest” if you are accompanied by a human who is not a “person” and who is not carrying a strawman around with him. Travellers do not need a driving licence.
Postal Demands Each person generally gets a number of demands for amounts to be paid. As an example of this, in Britain there is an annual charge for a television Licence. This is something which Americans find bizarre and highly amusing as they have nothing like it and find the notion laughable. If you get a demand for payment for any such licence, you will notice that it is not addressed to you, the human, but to the fiction which is the strawman which has a name which sounds like your name but is not the same. The name will be printed on the demand in all capital letters, or in rare cases will be preceded by “Mr”, “Mrs” or “Miss”, and any of those names refer to the strawman who sounds like you and which has a creation date which matches what you have been told was your birthday. You can pay this demand if you want to, but it is entirely optional and remember that it is not YOU who is being billed. Also worth remembering that you, the human, are bound by Common Law and not legal statutes, and Common Law does not require you to pay any form of tax.
The company invoicing the strawman is hoping that you don’t catch on to the fact that it is not you who is being billed, and so make the payment as a mistake on your part. Interestingly, the strawman does not own a television set and so is not required to have a licence anyway. Being only a piece of paper, the strawman can be considered to be deaf, dumb, blind and paralysed as it can’t perform any action, can’t see anything, can’t hear anything and can’t say anything. Anyway, the company looking for the money is in the business of fooling people, so it sends out batches of letters to an area, claiming that a “detector van” will be in the area in a few days and so anyone without a licence will be detected and prosecuted, so better get one now. This is done in the hope that a percentage of the people mailed will fall for it and start paying them money. They may even send around a van with all sorts of peculiar attachments on it, in the hope that it will frighten residents of the area who are not already paying them. A driver of one of those vans says that none of the equipment in the van does anything and certainly can’t detect anything to do with television – it’s all there as window dressing for the operation. The reality is that they just check the addresses against their database of who is already paying them.
If you don’t want to pay this unnecessary charge on behalf of a strawman, then you can mark the envelope “NO CONTRACT – Return to Sender” and put it in a post box. Any subsequent letters can be treated in exactly the same way. As in all cases, do not have any telephone conversations about it, as verbal communications bristle with Legalese verbal traps. At most, say that you wish to deal with any such matters by post and terminate the call. It does not matter in the slightest if an employee turns up at your home and hands you a letter or puts it through your letter box. The letter is NOT for you or even addressed to you – it is addressed to the strawman, so it can be posted back the same as any other letter.